Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33783569›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

The presence of contrast agent increases organ radiation dose in contrast-enhanced CT.

Mahta Mazloumi, Gert Van Gompel, Veerle Kersemans, Johan de Mey, Nico Buls

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahta MazloumiDepartment of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. Mahta.Mazloumi@vub.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1150-5050
Gert Van GompelDepartment of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Veerle KersemansDepartment of Oncology, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
Johan de MeyDepartment of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Nico BulsDepartment of Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1S52720N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRoutine dosimetry calculations do not account for the presence of iodine in organs and tissues during CT acquisition. This study aims to investigate the impact of contrast agent (CA) on radiation dose.

methodsFirst, relation between absorbed radiation dose and iodine concentrations was investigated using a cylindrical water phantom with iodine-saline dilution insertions. Subsequently, a retrospective study on abdominal dual-energy CT (DECT) patient data was performed to assess the increase of the local absorbed radiation dose compared to a non-contrast scan. Absorbed doses were estimated with Monte Carlo simulations using the individual CT voxel data of phantom and patients. Further, organ segmentations were performed to obtain the dose in liver, liver parenchyma, left kidney, right kidney, aorta, and spleen.

resultsIn the phantom study, a linear relation was observed between the radiation dose normalized by computed tomography dose index (CTDI) and CA concentrations I

conclusionsCompared to a non-contrast scan, the organ doses increase by 30% in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. This study suggests considering CA in dosimetry calculations, epidemiological studies, and organ dose estimations while developing new CT protocols. KEY POINTS: • The presence of contrast media increases radiation absorption in CT, and this increase is related to the iodine content in the organs. • The increased radiation absorption due to contrast media can lead to an average 30% increase in absorbed organ dose. • Iodine should be considered in CT radiation safety studies.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansMonte Carlo MethodPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaHumansIodinePhantoms, ImagingRadiation dosageTomography, X-ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID33783569
PMCPMC8452580
OpenAlexW3139986225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.