Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33783361›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

A Framework (SOCRATex) for Hierarchical Annotation of Unstructured Electronic Health Records and Integration Into a Standardized Medical Database: Development and Usability Study.

Jimyung Park, Seng Chan You, Eugene Jeong, Chunhua Weng, Dongsu Park, Jin Roh, Dong Yun Lee, Jae Youn Cheong, Jin Wook Choi, Mira Kang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Clinical Data Warehousing: A Scoping Review.Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jimyung Park *Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2655-5517
Seng Chan You *Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5052-6399
Eugene JeongDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8240-1198
Chunhua WengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-0214
Dongsu ParkDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5614-3145
Jin RohDepartment of Pathology, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-355X
Dong Yun LeeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3678-9862
Jae Youn CheongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6246-1783
Jin Wook ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2396-4705
Mira KangDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7842-0035
Rae Woong ParkDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-3287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough electronic health records (EHRs) have been widely used in secondary assessments, clinical documents are relatively less utilized owing to the lack of standardized clinical text frameworks across different institutions.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a framework for processing unstructured clinical documents of EHRs and integration with standardized structured data.

methodsWe developed a framework known as Staged Optimization of Curation, Regularization, and Annotation of clinical text (SOCRATex). SOCRATex has the following four aspects: (1) extracting clinical notes for the target population and preprocessing the data, (2) defining the annotation schema with a hierarchical structure, (3) performing document-level hierarchical annotation using the annotation schema, and (4) indexing annotations for a search engine system. To test the usability of the proposed framework, proof-of-concept studies were performed on EHRs. We defined three distinctive patient groups and extracted their clinical documents (ie, pathology reports, radiology reports, and admission notes). The documents were annotated and integrated into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP)-common data model (CDM) database. The annotations were used for creating Cox proportional hazard models with different settings of clinical analyses to measure (1) all-cause mortality, (2) thyroid cancer recurrence, and (3) 30-day hospital readmission.

resultsOverall, 1055 clinical documents of 953 patients were extracted and annotated using the defined annotation schemas. The generated annotations were indexed into an unstructured textual data repository. Using the annotations of pathology reports, we identified that node metastasis and lymphovascular tumor invasion were associated with all-cause mortality among colon and rectum cancer patients (both P=.02). The other analyses involving measuring thyroid cancer recurrence using radiology reports and 30-day hospital readmission using admission notes in depressive disorder patients also showed results consistent with previous findings.

conclusionsWe propose a framework for hierarchical annotation of textual data and integration into a standardized OMOP-CDM medical database. The proof-of-concept studies demonstrated that our framework can effectively process and integrate diverse clinical documents with standardized structured data for clinical research.

Indexed as

common data modeldata curationdata managementnatural language processingsearch engine

Identifiers

PMID33783361
PMCPMC8044740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.