Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33783254›Full record

Trial reportJournal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology2022

Computerized Cognitive Training in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kevin Duff, Jian Ying, Kayla R Suhrie, Bonnie C A Dalley, Taylor J Atkinson, Sariah M Porter, Ava M Dixon, Dustin B Hammers, Fredric D Wolinsky

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Cognitive Interventions for Neurodegenerative Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin DuffDepartment of Neurology, Center for Alzheimer's Care, Imaging and Research, 14434University of Utah, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9336-2400
Jian YingDepartment of Internal Medicine, 14434University of Utah, UT, USA.
Kayla R SuhrieDepartment of Neurology, Center for Alzheimer's Care, Imaging and Research, 14434University of Utah, UT, USA.
Bonnie C A DalleyDepartment of Neurology, Center for Alzheimer's Care, Imaging and Research, 14434University of Utah, UT, USA.
Taylor J AtkinsonDepartment of Neurology, Center for Alzheimer's Care, Imaging and Research, 14434University of Utah, UT, USA.
Sariah M PorterDepartment of Neurology, Center for Alzheimer's Care, Imaging and Research, 14434University of Utah, UT, USA.
Ava M DixonDepartment of Neurology, Center for Alzheimer's Care, Imaging and Research, 14434University of Utah, UT, USA.
Dustin B HammersDepartment of Neurology, Center for Alzheimer's Care, Imaging and Research, 14434University of Utah, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1644-2618
Fredric D WolinskyCollege of Public Health, 4083University of Iowa, IA, USA.
University of Utah · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

TRIAL OF VALPROATE TO ATTENUATE THE PROGRESSION OF ADU01AG010483 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI AISEN, PAUL S. · 1991 to 2012
$116.2M
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE-UL1: BPCAUL1RR025764 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2008 to 2011
$19.4M
University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science-UL1UL1TR000105 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2012 to 2013
$5.1M
Cognitive training and practice effects in MCIR01AG045163 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DUFF, KEVIN M · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000105NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025764NIA NIH HHS R01 AG045163NIA NIH HHS U01 AG010483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveComputerized cognitive training has been successful in healthy older adults, but its efficacy has been mixed in patients with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).

methodsIn a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel clinical trial, we examined the short- and long-term efficacy of a brain-plasticity computerized cognitive training in 113 participants with amnestic MCI.

resultsImmediately after 40-hours of training, participants in the active control group who played computer games performed better than those in the experimental group on the primary cognitive outcome (p = 0.02), which was an auditory memory/attention composite score. There were no group differences on 2 secondary outcomes (global cognitive composite and rating of daily functioning). After 1 year, there was no difference between the 2 groups on primary or secondary outcomes. No adverse events were noted.

conclusionsAlthough the experimental cognitive training program did not improve outcomes in those with MCI, the short-term effects of the control group should not be dismissed, which may alter treatment recommendations for these patients.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionAgedAttentionCognitionDouble-Blind MethodHumansNeuropsychological TestsTreatment Outcomeclinical trialcomputerized cognitive trainingmemorymild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID33783254
PMCPMC12860473
OpenAlexW3146879145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.