Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33782971›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2022

Correlates of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in Kenya: A cross-sectional study.

Kathryn E Kemper, Christine J McGrath, Linda O Eckert, John Kinuthia, Benson Singa, Agnes Langat, Alison L Drake

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathryn E KemperDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2847-0325
Christine J McGrathDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Linda O EckertDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
John KinuthiaDepartment of Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Benson SingaKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Agnes LangatDivision of Global HIV & TB, U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Nairobi, Kenya.
Alison L DrakeDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · KEKenya Medical Research Institute · KEKenyatta National Hospital · KE

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SARA R. CURRAN · 2017 to 2026
$6.3M
Optimizing repeat HIV testing during pregnancy and postpartum for PMTCTK01AI116298 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DRAKE, ALISON L · 2015 to 2019
$632k
Division of Global HIV and TB (DGHT)Intramural CDC HHS CC999999National Institute for Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNCHHSTP CDC HHS U2G PS002047NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI116298NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042828NIH HHS K01 AI116298NIH HHS P30 AI027757University of WashingtonUniversity of Washington (UW) Global Center for Integrated Health of Women, Adolescents, and Children (Global WACh)US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief U2GPS002047UW/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death among Kenyan women. It is important to identify how demographics and knowledge of cervical cancer are associated with screening to determine best practices for targeted screening efforts.

methodsWe conducted a sub-analysis of women who were asked about cervical cancer from a cross-sectional study of women attending large HIV care and treatment programs across Kenya between June and September 2016.

results1671 of 3007 (56%) women reported ever being screened, 804 (48%) of whom were screened within the last 12 months. Prevalence of screening was highest among women who were older (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR] age 35-49 vs. 18-24: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.68-3.05, P < 0.001), employed (APR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.24-1.93, P < 0.001), married (APR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.01-1.59, P = 0.047), had at least secondary education (APR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.19-1.77, P < 0.001), with longer time since HIV diagnosis (APR: 1.09/year average increase, 95% CI: 1.04-1.13, P < 0.001). 36% knew cervical cancer is treatable.

conclusionCharacteristics linked to social or economic capital are correlated with cervical cancer screening. Integrating cervical cancer screening into HIV care and educating patients on the need for annual screening and potential treatment are important strategies for increasing screening uptake.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansKenyaMass ScreeningMiddle Agedcancer screeningcervical cancerearly detection of cancerhealth systemsHIVKenyareproductive health

Identifiers

PMID33782971
PMCPMC11298692
OpenAlexW3147055070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.