ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2021
Dichotic listening performance with cochlear-implant simulations of ear asymmetry is consistent with difficulty ignoring clearer speech.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Baseline Differences in Cochlear Implant Candidates: Bilateral Traditional vs. Expanded Indications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cochlear-implant dichotic listening performance and effort are disrupted with functional ear asymmetry.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Reduced digit spans and ear dominance using dichotic digits in bimodal cochlear-implant users.JASA express letters · 2024Article
- Effect of experimentally introduced interaural frequency mismatch on sentence recognition in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.JASA express letters · 2023Article
- Effect of experimentally introduced interaural frequency mismatch on sentence recognition in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Asymmetric temporal envelope sensitivity: Within- and across-ear envelope comparisons in listeners with bilateral cochlear implants.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Interaural asymmetry of dynamic range: Abnormal fusion, bilateral interference, and shifts in attention.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Dichotic listening performance and effort as a function of spectral resolution and interaural symmetry.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- Review of Binaural Processing With Asymmetrical Hearing Outcomes in Patients With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.Trends in hearingReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There are an increasing number of bilateral and single-sided-deafness cochlear-implant (CI) users who hope to achieve improved spatial-hearing abilities through access to sound in both ears. It is, however, unclear how speech is processed when inputs are functionally asymmetrical, which may have an impact on spatial-hearing abilities. Therefore, functionally asymmetrical hearing was controlled and parametrically manipulated using a channel vocoder as a CI simulation. In Experiment 1, normal-hearing (NH) listeners performed a dichotic listening task (i.e., selective attention to one ear, ignoring the other) using asymmetrical signal degradation. Spectral resolution varied independently in each ear (4, 8, 16 channels, and unprocessed control). Performance decreased with decreasing resolution in the target ear and increasing resolution in the interferer ear. In Experiment 2, these results were replicated using a divided attention task (attend to both ears, report one after sentence completion) in both NH and bilateral CI listeners, although overall performance was lower than in Experiment 1. In Experiment 3, frequency-to-place mismatch simulated shallow CI insertion depths (0, 3, 6-mm shifts, and unprocessed control). Performance mostly decreased with increasing shift in the target ear and decreasing shift in the interferer ear; however, performance nonmonotonicities occurred. The worst performance occurred when the shift matched across ears, suggesting that pitch similarity increases difficulty. The results show that it is more difficult to attend an ear that is relatively degraded or distorted, which may set spatial-hearing limitations for CI users when trying to attend to a target in complex auditory scenes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.