Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33782853›Full record

ArticleAmbio2022

Temporal trends in opportunistic citizen science reports across multiple taxa.

Jonas Knape, Stephen James Coulson, René van der Wal, Debora Arlt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonas KnapeDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Inst för Ekologi, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. jonas.knape@slu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8012-5131
Stephen James CoulsonSwedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Almas Allé 8E, Box 7007, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
René van der WalDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Inst för Ekologi, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Debora ArltDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Inst för Ekologi, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2017-1064Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (SE) 2015-00287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opportunistic reporting of species observations to online platforms provide one of the most extensive sources of information about the distribution and status of organisms in the wild. The lack of a clear sampling design, and changes in reporting over time, leads to challenges when analysing these data for temporal change in organisms. To better understand temporal changes in reporting, we use records submitted to an online platform in Sweden (Artportalen), currently containing 80 million records. Focussing on five taxonomic groups, fungi, plants, beetles, butterflies and birds, we decompose change in reporting into long-term and seasonal trends, and effects of weekdays, holidays and weather variables. The large surge in number of records since the launch of the, initially taxa-specific, portals is accompanied by non-trivial long-term and seasonal changes that differ between the taxonomic groups and are likely due to changes in, and differences between, the user communities and observer behaviour.

Indexed as

ButterfliesCitizen ScienceAnimalsBirdsPlantsSwedenCitizen science dataMotivationObserver behaviourSampling bias

Identifiers

PMID33782853
PMCPMC8651922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.