SynthesisHeart failure reviews2022
Global longitudinal strain predicts responders after cardiac resynchronization therapy-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Heart failure reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical practice guidelines for diagnostic and treatment of the chronic heart failure.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Guideline
- Longitudinal comparison of dyssynchrony correction and 'strain' improvement by conduction system pacing: LEVEL-AT trial secondary findings.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2024Trial
- Prospective Study on the Evaluation of Echocardiographic Parameters as Predictors of a Positive Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Mexico.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Novel echocardiographic tools for predicting a good response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- A Prospective Pilot Study for Prognosis of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Super-Response Using Electrical and Mechanical Dyssynchrony Assessment in Patients with Heart Failure and Strauss Left Bundle Branch Block Criteria.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Functional and Imaging Implications of Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Impact of antihypertensive treatment on myocardial mechanics in elderly hypertensive patients with different left ventricular geometry patterns: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Device-therapy in chronic heart failure: Cardiac contractility modulation versus cardiac resynchronization therapy.ESC heart failure · 2025Observational
- The Prognostic Role of Global Longitudinal Strain and NT-proBNP in Heart Failure Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Refining cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comprehensive review on the role of advanced multimodality imaging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Response predictors to cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic heart failure: a 10-year-cardiovascular center experience.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Article
- The saga of dyssynchrony imaging: Are we getting to the point.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the association between baseline global longitudinal strain (GLS) and ΔGLS (difference of baseline GLS and follow-up) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response defined either with clinical or with echocardiographic characteristics. This meta-analysis was performed in accordance to both the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Two independent investigators performed a comprehensive systematic search in MedLine, EMBASE and Cochrane databases through September 2019 without limitations. Data analysis was performed by using the Review Manager software (RevMan), version 5.3, and Stata 13 software. A p value of less than 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant. Twelve studies (1004 patients, mean age 63.8 years old, males 69.4%) provided data on the association of baseline GLS with the response to CRT therapy. We found that CRT responders had significantly better resting GLS values compared with non-responders [GLS mean difference -2.13 (-3.03, -1.23), p < 0.001, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.