Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33782770›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2021

Left ventricular longitudinal wall fractional shortening accurately predicts longitudinal strain in critically ill patients with septic shock.

Patrik Johansson Blixt, Michelle S Chew, Rasmus Åhman, Lina de Geer, Lill Blomqwist, Meriam Åström Aneq, Jan Engvall, Henrik Andersson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patrik Johansson Blixt *Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, S-58185, Linköping, Sweden. patbl790@student.liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-6772
Michelle S Chew *Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, S-58185, Linköping, Sweden.
Rasmus ÅhmanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, S-58185, Linköping, Sweden.
Lina de GeerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, S-58185, Linköping, Sweden.
Lill BlomqwistDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Meriam Åström AneqDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Jan EngvallDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Henrik AnderssonDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, S-58185, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

Länsstyrelsen Östergötland SC-2019-00155-12Linköpings Universitet LIO-900161Linköpings Universitet LIO-935252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeft ventricular longitudinal strain (LVLS) may be a sensitive indicator of left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with sepsis, but is dependent on high image quality and analysis software. Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) and the novel left ventricular longitudinal wall fractional shortening (LV-LWFS) are bedside echocardiographic indicators of LV systolic function that are less dependent on image quality. Both are sparsely investigated in the critically ill population, and may potentially be used as surrogates for LVLS. We assessed if LVLS may be predicted by LV-LWFS and MAPSE in patients with septic shock. We also assessed the repeatability and inter-rater agreement of LVLS, LV-LWFS and MAPSE measurements.

results122 TTE studies from 3 echocardiographic data repositories of patients admitted to ICU with septic shock were retrospectively assessed, of which 73 were suitable for LVLS analysis using speckle tracking. The correlations between LVLS vs. LV-LWFS and LVLS vs. MAPSE were 0.89 (p < 0.001) and 0.81 (p < 0.001) with mean squared errors of 5.8% and 9.1%, respectively. Using the generated regression equation, LV-LWFS predicted LVLS with a high degree of accuracy and precision, with bias and limits of agreement of -0.044 ± 4.7% and mean squared prediction error of 5.8%. Interobserver repeatability was good, with high intraclass correlation coefficients (0.96-0.97), small bias and tight limits of agreement (≤ 4.1% for all analyses) between observers for all measurements.

conclusionsLV-LWFS may be used to estimate LVLS in patients with septic shock. MAPSE also performed well, but was slightly inferior compared to LV-LWFS in estimating LVLS. Feasibility of MAPSE and LV-LWFS was excellent, as was interobserver repeatability.

Indexed as

Fractional shorteningLeft ventricleMAPSESepsisStrainSystolic function

Identifiers

PMID33782770
PMCPMC8007689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.