Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33782620›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2021

An emergent neural coactivity code for dynamic memory.

Mohamady El-Gaby, Hayley M Reeve, Vítor Lopes-Dos-Santos, Natalia Campo-Urriza, Pavel V Perestenko, Alexander Morley, Lauren A M Strickland, István P Lukács, Ole Paulsen, David Dupret

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Contamination of Engram Coactivity Networks During Forgetting.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Subspace communication in the hippocampal-retrosplenial axis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamady El-GabyMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. mohamady.el-gaby@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6344-3859
Hayley M ReeveMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1598-6613
Vítor Lopes-Dos-SantosMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Natalia Campo-UrrizaMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Pavel V PerestenkoMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Alexander MorleyMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lauren A M StricklandMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
István P LukácsDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ole PaulsenPhysiological Laboratory, Department of Physiology Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2258-5455
David DupretMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. david.dupret@bndu.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0040-1766
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N00597X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N006836/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00003/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_12024/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural correlates of external variables provide potential internal codes that guide an animal's behavior. Notably, first-order features of neural activity, such as single-neuron firing rates, have been implicated in encoding information. However, the extent to which higher-order features, such as multineuron coactivity, play primary roles in encoding information or secondary roles in supporting single-neuron codes remains unclear. Here, we show that millisecond-timescale coactivity among hippocampal CA1 neurons discriminates distinct, short-lived behavioral contingencies. This contingency discrimination was unrelated to the tuning of individual neurons, but was instead an emergent property of their coactivity. Contingency-discriminating patterns were reactivated offline after learning, and their reinstatement predicted trial-by-trial memory performance. Moreover, optogenetic suppression of inputs from the upstream CA3 region during learning impaired coactivity-based contingency information in the CA1 and subsequent dynamic memory retrieval. These findings identify millisecond-timescale coactivity as a primary feature of neural firing that encodes behaviorally relevant variables and supports memory retrieval.

Indexed as

AnimalsCA1 Region, HippocampalLearningMemoryMental RecallMiceModels, NeurologicalNeuronsOptogenetics

Identifiers

PMID33782620
PMCPMC7610741
OpenAlexW3133863581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.