Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33782532›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2021

Impairment of corneal epithelial wound healing is association with increased neutrophil infiltration and reactive oxygen species activation in tenascin X-deficient mice.

Takayoshi Sumioka, Hiroki Iwanishi, Yuka Okada, Masayasu Miyajima, Kana Ichikawa, Peter S Reinach, Ken-Ichi Matsumoto, Shizuya Saika

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Aprepitant Restores Corneal Sensitivity and Reduces Pain in DED.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Combined Transcriptomic and Proteomic ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  14. Corneal stromal repair and regeneration.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2022
    Review
  15. Wireless-Powered Electrical Bandage Contact Lens for Facilitating Corneal Wound Healing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Matricellular proteins in cutaneous wound healing.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Takayoshi SumiokaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan. sumioka@wakayama-med.ac.jp.
Hiroki IwanishiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan.
Yuka OkadaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan.
Masayasu MiyajimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan.
Kana IchikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan.
Peter S ReinachDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-3494-4523
Ken-Ichi MatsumotoDepartment of Biosignaling and Radioisotope Experiment, Interdisciplinary Center for Science Research, Organization for Research and Academic Information, Shimane University, Izumo, Enya-cho, Japan.
Shizuya SaikaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan.
Wakayama Medical University · JPShimane University · JPWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to uncover the role of tenascin X in modulation of healing in mouse corneas subjected to epithelium debridement. Healing in corneas with an epithelial defect was evaluated at the levels of gene and protein expression. Wound healing-related mediators and inflammatory cell infiltration were detected by histology, immunohistochemistry and real-time RT-PCR. Tenascin X protein was upregulated in the wounded wild-type (WT) corneal epithelium. The lack of tenascin X impaired closure of an epithelial defect and accelerated infiltration of neutrophils into the wound periphery as compared to the response in WT tissue. Expression of wound healing-related proinflammatory and reparative components, i.e., interleukin-6, transforming growth factor β, matrix metalloproteinases, were unaffected by the loss of tenascin X expression. Marked accumulation of malondialdehyde (a lipid peroxidation-derived product) was observed in KO healing epithelia as compared with its WT counterpart. Neutropenia induced by systemic administration of a specific antibody rescued the impairment of epithelial healing in KO corneas, with reduction of malondialdehyde levels in the epithelial cells. Finally, we showed that a chemical scavenging reactive oxygen species reversed the impairment of attenuation of epithelial repair with a reduction of tissue levels of malondialdehyde. In conclusion, loss of tenascin X prolonged corneal epithelial wound healing and increased neutrophilic inflammatory response to debridement in mice. Tenascin X contributes to the control of neutrophil infiltration needed to support the regenerative response to injury and prevent the oxidative stress mediators from rising to cytotoxic levels.

Indexed as

Neutrophil InfiltrationAnimalsCorneaMiceMice, KnockoutReactive Oxygen SpeciesTenascinWound HealingReactive Oxygen SpeciesTenascintenascin X

Identifiers

PMID33782532
PMCPMC8137452
OpenAlexW3148011013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.