Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33782484›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

In vitro skin culture media influence the viability and inflammatory response of primary macrophages.

Chiara Griffoni, Berna Neidhart, Ke Yang, Florian Groeber-Becker, Katharina Maniura-Weber, Thomas Dandekar, Heike Walles, Markus Rottmar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Skin-on-chip: Quo vadis?APL bioengineering · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Skin Microbiome: Current Landscape and Future Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiara GriffoniLaboratory for Biointerfaces, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Berna NeidhartLaboratory for Biointerfaces, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Ke YangLaboratory for Biointerfaces, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Florian Groeber-BeckerDepartment Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Katharina Maniura-WeberLaboratory for Biointerfaces, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Thomas DandekarDepartment of Bioinformatics, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Heike WallesTranslational Center for Regenerative Therapies, Fraunhofer-Institute for Silicate Research ISC, Würzburg, Germany.
Markus RottmarLaboratory for Biointerfaces, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland. markus.rottmar@empa.ch.
Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology · CHFraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research · DEOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The replacement of animal models for investigation of inflammation and wound healing has been advancing by means of in vitro skin equivalents with increasing levels of complexity. However, the current in vitro skin models still have a limited pre-clinical relevance due to their lack of immune cells. So far, few steps have been made towards the incorporation of immune cells into in vitro skin and the requirements for immunocompetent co-cultures remain unexplored. To establish suitable conditions for incorporating macrophages into skin models, we evaluated the effects of different media on primary keratinocytes, fibroblasts and macrophages. Skin maturation was affected by culture in macrophage medium, while macrophages showed reduced viability, altered cell morphology and decreased response to pro- and anti-inflammatory stimuli in skin differentiation media, both in 2D and 3D. The results indicate that immunocompetent skin models have specific, complex requirements for supporting an accurate detection of immune responses, which point at the identification of a suitable culture medium as a crucial pre-requisite for the development of physiologically relevant models.

Indexed as

Cell SurvivalCulture MediaIn Vitro TechniquesMacrophagesCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID33782484
PMCPMC8007571
OpenAlexW3151752144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.