ArticleScientific reports2021
Blood donor variability is a modulatory factor for P. falciparum invasion phenotyping assays.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving reproducibility of Plasmodium falciparum culture: a large-language-model-driven literature review and a parasite growth variability assessment of donor red blood cells.Malaria journal · 2025Pooled it
- Vaccine-induced human monoclonal antibodies to PfRH5 show broadly neutralizing activity against P. falciparum clinical isolates.NPJ vaccines · 2024Article
- Application of optical tweezer technology reveals that PfEBA and PfRH ligands, not PfMSP1, play a central role in Plasmodium falciparum merozoite-erythrocyte attachment.PLoS pathogens · 2024Article
- Article
- Short-term cryopreservation and thawing have minimal effects onFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Phenotypic characterization of GhanaianFrontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Human erythrocytes are indispensable for Plasmodium falciparum development. Unlike other eukaryotic cells, there is no existing erythroid cell line capable of supporting long-term P. falciparum in vitro experiments. Consequently, invasion phenotyping experiments rely on erythrocytes of different individuals. However, the contribution of the erythrocytes variation in influencing invasion rates remains unknown, which represents a challenge for conducting large-scale comparative studies. Here, we used erythrocytes of different blood groups harboring different hemoglobin genotypes to assess the relative contribution of blood donor variability in P. falciparum invasion phenotyping assays. For each donor, we investigated the relationship between parasite invasion phenotypes and erythrocyte phenotypic characteristics, including the expression levels of surface receptors (e.g. the human glycophorins A and C, the complement receptor 1 and decay accelerating factor), blood groups (e.g. ABO/Rh system), and hemoglobin genotypes (e.g. AA, AS and AC). Across all donors, there were significant differences in invasion efficiency following treatment with either neuraminidase, trypsin or chymotrypsin relative to the control erythrocytes. Primarily, we showed that the levels of key erythrocyte surface receptors and their sensitivity to enzyme treatment significantly differed across donors. However, invasion efficiency did not correlate with susceptibility to enzyme treatment or with the levels of the selected erythrocyte surface receptors. Furthermore, we found no relationship between P. falciparum invasion phenotype and blood group or hemoglobin genotype. Altogether, our findings demonstrate the need to consider erythrocyte donor uniformity and anticipate challenges associated with blood donor variability in early stages of large-scale study design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.