Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33782436›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The endophytic microbiota of Citrus limon is transmitted from seed to shoot highlighting differences of bacterial and fungal community structures.

Teresa Faddetta, Loredana Abbate, Pasquale Alibrandi, Walter Arancio, Davide Siino, Francesco Strati, Carlotta De Filippo, Sergio Fatta Del Bosco, Francesco Carimi, Anna Maria Puglia and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Omics landscapes in molecular mechanisms withFood chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Bacterial dynamics and exchange in plant-insect interactions.Current research in insect science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Teresa Faddetta *Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Loredana Abbate *Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources (IBBR), National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.
Pasquale AlibrandiDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Walter ArancioDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Davide SiinoDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Francesco StratiLaboratory of Mucosal Immunology, Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy.
Carlotta De FilippoInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
Sergio Fatta Del BoscoInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources (IBBR), National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.
Francesco CarimiInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources (IBBR), National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.
Anna Maria PugliaDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Massimiliano CardinaleInstitute of Applied Microbiology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Giuseppe GalloDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy. giuseppe.gallo@unipa.it.
Francesco MercatiInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources (IBBR), National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.
University of Palermo · ITInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources · ITNational Research Council · ITDeleted InstitutionEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Salento · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citrus limon (L.) Burm. F. is an important evergreen fruit crop whose rhizosphere and phyllosphere microbiota  have been characterized, while seed microbiota is still unknown. Bacterial and fungal endophytes were isolated from C. limon surface-sterilized seeds. The isolated fungi-belonging to Aspergillus, Quambalaria and Bjerkandera genera-and bacteria-belonging to Staphylococcus genus-were characterized for indoleacetic acid production and phosphate solubilization. Next Generation Sequencing based approaches were then used to characterize the endophytic bacterial and fungal microbiota structures of surface-sterilized C. limon seeds and of shoots obtained under aseptic conditions from in vitro growing seedlings regenerated from surface-sterilized seeds. This analysis highlighted that Cutibacterium and Acinetobacter were the most abundant bacterial genera in both seeds and shoots, while Cladosporium and Debaryomyces were the most abundant fungal genera in seeds and shoots, respectively. The localization of bacterial endophytes in seed and shoot tissues was revealed by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization coupled with Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy revealing vascular bundle colonization. Thus, these results highlighted for the first time the structures of endophytic microbiota of C. limon seeds and the transmission to shoots, corroborating the idea of a vertical transmission of plant microbiota and suggesting its crucial role in seed germination and plant development.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBacteriaCitrusFungiPlant ShootsSeeds

Identifiers

PMID33782436
PMCPMC8007603
OpenAlexW3142693340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.