Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781922›Full record

ArticleAlcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)2021

Effect of caffeine on alcohol drinking in mice.

Harold L Haun, Anne C K Olsen, Katharina E Koch, Lauryn N Luderman, Christina E May, William C Griffin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harold L HaunCharleston Alcohol Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
Anne C K OlsenCharleston Alcohol Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
Katharina E KochCharleston Alcohol Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
Lauryn N LudermanCharleston Alcohol Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
Christina E MayCharleston Alcohol Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
William C GriffinCharleston Alcohol Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States. Electronic address: griffinw@musc.edu.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

TREATING ETHANOL WITHDRAWAL WITH LORAZEPAM/NALTREXONEP50AA010761 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Lisa M McTeague · 1996 to 2026
$46.8M
Adaptations in the Glutamatergic Ventral Hippocampus to Nucleus Accumbens Pathway in Alcohol Drinking and DependenceR21AA024881 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI GRIFFIN, WILLIAM C · 2017 to 2018
$392k
NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA010761NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA024881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixing alcohol (ethanol) with caffeinated beverages continues to be a common and risky practice. Energy drinks are one type of caffeinated beverage that may be especially problematic when used as mixers, due to their relatively high caffeine content in combination with their highly sweetened flavor profile. The present study used a mouse model of limited-access drinking and lickometer circuitry to examine the effects of an energy drink anid its caffeine content on ethanol consumption. Predictably, the highly sweetened energy drink significantly increased ethanol intake compared to a plain ethanol solution (6.34 ± 0.2 vs. 5.01 ± 0.3 g/kg; Cohen's d = 1.79). Interestingly, adulterating a plain ethanol solution with the same concentration of caffeine (without sweetener) found in the energy drink also increased ethanol intake (5.47 ± 0.3 vs. 4.11 ± 0.3 g/kg; Cohen's d = 1.4). A lower concentration of caffeine was without effect on ethanol drinking. Interestingly, plain caffeine solutions at both tested concentrations provoked high numbers of bottle contacts, indicating that the mice found the solution palatable. These findings suggest that altering the bitterness profile of an ethanol solution with the addition of caffeine can increase intake in a similar manner as sweetening the solution. Further, the findings underscore the importance of taste in motivating ethanol consumption and the potential role that caffeine can have in this process.

Indexed as

CaffeineEnergy DrinksAlcohol DrinkingAnimalsEthanolMiceSweetening AgentsCaffeineEthanolSweetening AgentsAlcoholDrug interactionMouseStimulant

Identifiers

PMID33781922
PMCPMC8206008
OpenAlexW3152166822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.