Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781919›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2021

Development of a FHIR RDF data transformation and validation framework and its evaluation.

Eric Prud'hommeaux, Josh Collins, David Booth, Kevin J Peterson, Harold R Solbrig, Guoqian Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Customizable Data Quality Tool for Global Observational Research Networks.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eric Prud'hommeauxJaneiro Digital, Boston, MA, United States; W3C/MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Josh CollinsJaneiro Digital, Boston, MA, United States.
David BoothYosemite Project, Somerville, MA, United States.
Kevin J PetersonMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Harold R SolbrigJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Guoqian JiangMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States. Electronic address: jiang.guoqian@mayo.edu.

Funding

CD2H - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) IDeA CTR CollaborationU24TR002306 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI CHUTE, CHRISTOPHER G, EDDY, JAMES A · 2017 to 2021
$28.9M
FHIRCat: Enabling the Semantics of FHIR and Terminologies for Clinical and Translational ResearchR01EB030529 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI FREIMUTH, ROBERT RICHARD · 2021 to 2024
$2.7M
FHIRCat: Enabling the Semantics of FHIR and Terminologies for Clinical and Translational ResearchR56EB028101 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, GUOQIAN · 2019 to 2019
$601k
NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR002306NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030529NIBIB NIH HHS R56 EB028101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resource Description Framework (RDF) is one of the three standardized data formats in the HL7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) specification and is being used by healthcare and research organizations to join FHIR and non-FHIR data. However, RDF previously had not been integrated into popular FHIR tooling packages, hindering the adoption of FHIR RDF in the semantic web and other communities. The objective of the study is to develop and evaluate a Java based FHIR RDF data transformation toolkit to facilitate the use and validation of FHIR RDF data. We extended the popular HAPI FHIR tooling to add RDF support, thus enabling FHIR data in XML or JSON to be transformed to or from RDF. We also developed an RDF Shape Expression (ShEx)-based validation framework to verify conformance of FHIR RDF data to the ShEx schemas provided in the FHIR specification for FHIR versions R4 and R5. The effectiveness of ShEx validation was demonstrated by testing it against 2693 FHIR R4 examples and 2197 FHIR R5 examples that are included in the FHIR specification. A total of 5 types of errors including missing properties, unknown element, missing resource Type, invalid attribute value, and unknown resource name in the R5 examples were revealed, demonstrating the value of the ShEx in the quality assurance of the evolving R5 development. This FHIR RDF data transformation and validation framework, based on HAPI and ShEx, is robust and ready for community use in adopting FHIR RDF, improving FHIR data quality, and evolving the FHIR specification.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsData transformationFast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)Quality assuranceResource Description Framework (RDF)Semantic webShape Expression (ShEx)

Identifiers

PMID33781919
PMCPMC8131260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.