Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781856›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences2021

Identification of harmine and β-carboline analogs from a high-throughput screen of an approved drug collection; profiling as differential inhibitors of DYRK1A and monoamine oxidase A and for in vitro and in vivo anti-cancer studies.

Michael Tarpley, Helen O Oladapo, Dillon Strepay, Thomas B Caligan, Lhoucine Chdid, Hassan Shehata, Jose R Roques, Rhashad Thomas, Christopher P Laudeman, Rob U Onyenwoke and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cancers · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Head-to-head comparison of [Acta neuropathologica · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael TarpleyBiomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA.
Helen O OladapoBiomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA; INBS PhD Program, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA.
Dillon StrepayDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA.
Thomas B CaliganBiomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA.
Lhoucine ChdidBiomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA.
Hassan ShehataBiomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA; INBS PhD Program, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA.
Jose R RoquesLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
Rhashad ThomasDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences; North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA.
Christopher P LaudemanBiomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA.
Rob U OnyenwokeBiomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences; North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA.
David B DarrLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
Kevin P WilliamsBiomanufacturing Research Institute and Technology Enterprise, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences; North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707, USA. Electronic address: kpwilliams@nccu.edu.
North Carolina Central University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Understanding Perceptions of HIV Risk, PrEP, and PrEP use among African American Women Attending an HBCUU54MD012392 · NIMHD · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI MICHELER Ricardo RICHARDSON · 2017 to 2026
$38.1M
Targeting the MEKK2-ERK5 Signaling Node in Triple Negative Breast CancerU54CA156735 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI RICHARDSON, MICHELER RICARDO · 2010 to 2021
$13.0M
Project 2: Identifying and modulating genetic modifiers of GLI1 activation in inflammatory breast cancer.P20CA202924 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI PATIERNO, STEVEN R, WILLIAMS, KEVIN PETER · 2016 to 2019
$870k
Targeting DYRK1A Modulation of GLI1 for Anti-Tumor EfficacyR15CA208651 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, KEVIN PETER · 2016 to 2016
$376k
The Hedgehog Pathway and Inflammatory Breast CancerSC2CA137844 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, KEVIN PETER · 2008 to 2010
$291k
NCI NIH HHS P20 CA202924NCI NIH HHS R15 CA208651NCI NIH HHS SC2 CA137844NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156735NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DYRK1A (dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1a) is highly expressed in glioma, an aggressive brain tumor, and has been proposed as a therapeutic target for cancer. In the current study, we have used an optimized and validated time-resolved fluorescence energy transfer (TR-FRET)-based DYRK1A assay for high-throughput screening (HTS) in 384-well format. A small-scale screen of the FDA-approved Prestwick drug collection identified the β-carboline, harmine, and four related analogs as DYRK1A inhibitors. Hits were confirmed by dose response and in an orthogonal DYRK1A assay. Harmine's potential therapeutic use has been hampered by its off-target activity for monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) which impacts multiple nervous system targets. Selectivity profiling of harmine and a broader collection of analogs allowed us to map some divergent SAR (structure-activity relationships) for the DYRK1A and MAO-A activities. The panel of harmine analogs had varying activities in vitro in glioblastoma (GBM) cell lines when tested for anti-proliferative effects using a high content imaging assay. In particular, of the identified analogs, harmol was found to have the best selectivity for DYRK1A over MAO-A and, when tested in a glioma tumor xenograft model, harmol demonstrated a better therapeutic window compared to harmine.

Indexed as

Monoamine Oxidase InhibitorsNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCarbolinesDyrk KinasesHarmineHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMonoamine OxidaseProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsCarbolinesDyrk KinasesHarmineMonoamine OxidaseMonoamine Oxidase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesDYRK1Agliomaharmineharmolhedgehoghigh throughput screeningmonoamine oxidase A

Identifiers

PMID33781856
PMCPMC8404221
OpenAlexW3146152874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.