Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781532›Full record

ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2021

Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing Reduces the Incidence of Bloodstream Infections in Adults Undergoing Inpatient Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Vinay K Giri, Kristin G Kegerreis, Yi Ren, Lauren M Bohannon, Erica Lobaugh-Jin, Julia A Messina, Anita Matthews, Yvonne M Mowery, Elizabeth Sito, Martha Lassiter and 18 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Exploring facilitators and barriers to daily chlorhexidine gluconate bathing in adult patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Vinay K GiriDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Stanford Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: vgiri@stanford.edu.
Kristin G KegerreisDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Yi RenDuke Cancer Institute Biostatistics Shared Resources, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Lauren M BohannonDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Erica Lobaugh-JinDepartment of Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Julia A MessinaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Anita MatthewsDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Yvonne M MoweryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Elizabeth SitoDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Martha LassiterDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jennifer L SaulloDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Sin-Ho JungDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Li MaDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Morris GreenbergDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Tessa M AndermannDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Marcel R M van den BrinkDepartment of Medicine and Department of Immunology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jonathan U PeledAdult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Antonio L C GomesDepartment of Immunology, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Taewoong ChoiDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Cristina J GasparettoDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Mitchell E HorwitzDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Gwynn D LongDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Richard D LopezDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
David A RizzieriDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Stefanie SarantopoulosDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Nelson J ChaoDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Deborah H AllenDuke University Health System Nursing, Durham, North Carolina.
Anthony D SungDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: anthony.sung@duke.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · USDuke University Hospital · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Support for QA/QC for Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002553 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JENNIFER S, MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2018 to 2023
$58.5M
Duke CTSA (Composite)KL2TR001115 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, KRAFT, MONICA · 2013 to 2017
$5.1M
Microbiota mechanisms and biomarkers in GVHDK08HL143189 · NHLBI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI PELED, JONATHAN · 2019 to 2023
$858k
Evaluating Effects of Age-related Microbiota Modulations in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant PatientsR21AG066388 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAO, NELSON J., SUNG, ANTHONY · 2019 to 2020
$443k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001115NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002553NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL143189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) occur in 20% to 45% of inpatient autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. Daily bathing with the antiseptic chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has been shown to reduce the incidence of BSIs in critically ill patients, although very few studies include HCT patients or have evaluated the impact of compliance on effectiveness. We conducted a prospective cohort study with historical controls to assess the impact of CHG bathing on the rate of BSIs and gut microbiota composition among adults undergoing inpatient HCT at the Duke University Medical Center. We present 1 year of data without CHG bathing (2016) and 2 years of data when CHG was used on the HCT unit (2017 and 2018). Because not all patients adhered to CHG, patients were grouped into four categories by rate of daily CHG usage: high (>75%), medium (50% to 75%), low (1% to 49%), and none (0%). Among 192 patients, univariate trend analysis demonstrated that increased CHG usage was associated with decreased incidence of clinically significant BSI, defined as any BSI requiring treatment by the medical team (high, 8% BSI; medium, 15.2%; low, 15.6%; no CHG, 30.3%; P = .003), laboratory-confirmed BSI (LCBI; P = .03), central line-associated BSI (P = .04), and mucosal barrier injury LCBI (MBI-LCBI; P = .002). Multivariate analysis confirmed a significant effect of CHG bathing on clinically significant BSI (P = .023) and MBI-LCBI (P = .007), without consistently impacting gut microbial diversity. Benefits of CHG bathing were most pronounced with >75% daily usage, and there were no adverse effects attributable to CHG. Adherence to daily CHG bathing significantly decreases the rate of bloodstream infection following HCT.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationSepsisAdultChlorhexidineHumansIncidenceInpatientsProspective StudiesChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconateBlood and marrow transplantationBloodstream infectionChlorhexidine GluconateCLABSIHematopoietic stem cell transplantationMBI-LCBIMicrobiomeMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID33781532
PMCPMC8010223
OpenAlexW3119235803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.