Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781418›Full record

ReviewJournal of equine veterinary science2021

Genetic Manipulation of the Equine Oocyte and Embryo.

Erin A Hisey, Pablo J Ross, Stuart Meyers

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of equine veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erin A HiseyDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA.
Pablo J RossDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA.
Stuart MeyersDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA. Electronic address: smeyers@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

UC Davis DVM/PhD Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM136559 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Xinbin Chen, Bethany Paige Cummings · 2020 to 2026
$2.2M
Students Training in Advanced Research (STAR) ProgramT35OD010956 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DANIKA L BANNASCH · 2012 to 2026
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136559NIH HHS T35 OD010956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As standard in vitro fertilization is not a viable technique in horses yet, many different techniques have been used to create equine embryos for research purposes. One such method is parthenogenesis in which an oocyte is induced to mature into an embryo-like state without the introduction of a spermatozoon, and thus they are not considered true embryos. Another method is somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), in which a somatic cell nucleus from an extant horse is inserted into an enucleated oocyte, creating a genetic clone of the donor horse. Due to limited availability of equine oocytes in the United States, researchers have investigated the potential for combining equine somatic cell nuclei with oocytes from other species to make embryos for research purposes, which has not been successful to date. There has also been a rising interest in producing transgenic animals using sperm exposed to exogenous DNA. The successful creation of transgenic equine blastocysts shows the promise of sperm mediated gene transfer (SMGT), but this method is not ideal for other applications, like gene therapy, because it cannot be used to induce targeted mutations. That is why technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 are vital. In this review, we argue that parthenogenesis, SCNT, and interspecies SCNT can be considered genetic manipulation strategies as they create embryos that are genetically identical to their parent cell. Here, we describe how these methods are performed and their applications and we also describe the few methods that have been used to directly modify equine embryos: SMGT and CRISPR/Cas9.

Indexed as

Embryo, MammalianOocytesAnimalsBlastocystHorsesMaleNuclear Transfer TechniquesParthenogenesisCRISPR/Cas9EmbryoEquineParthenogenesisSomatic cell nuclear transferSperm mediated gene transfer

Identifiers

PMID33781418
PMCPMC8605602
OpenAlexW3127125061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.