Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781354›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2023

Pregnancy during the pandemic: the impact of COVID-19-related stress on risk for prenatal depression.

Lucy S King, Daisy E Feddoes, Jaclyn S Kirshenbaum, Kathryn L Humphreys, Ian H Gotlib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Timing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use and risk for preterm birth and related adverse events: with a consideration of the COVID-19 pandemic period.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucy S KingDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2552-0614
Daisy E FeddoesDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jaclyn S KirshenbaumDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kathryn L HumphreysDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ian H GotlibDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3622-3199

Funding

Psychobiological Mechanisms Underlying the Association Between Early Life Stress and Depression Across AdolescenceR37MH101495 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI IAN H GOTLIB · 2018 to 2026
$6.6M
Effects of Environmental Stimulation and Nurturance on Neural and Endocrine Functions in InfantsR21HD090493 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOTLIB, IAN H · 2017 to 2018
$432k
The Role of Caregiver Social Processes on Neural and Endocrine Function in InfantsR21MH111978 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOTLIB, IAN H · 2017 to 2018
$432k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD090493NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH111978NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH101495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant women may be especially susceptible to negative events (i.e. adversity) related to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and negative affective responses to these events (i.e. stress). We examined the latent structure of stress and adversity related to the COVID-19 pandemic among pregnant women, potential antecedents of COVID-19-related stress and adversity in this population, and associations with prenatal depressive symptoms.

methodWe surveyed 725 pregnant women residing in the San Francisco Bay Area in March-May 2020, 343 of whom provided addresses that were geocoded and matched by census tract to measures of community-level risk. We compared their self-reported depressive symptoms to women matched on demographic factors and history of mental health difficulties who were pregnant prior to the pandemic.

resultsWomen who were pregnant during the pandemic were nearly twice as likely to have possible depression than were matched women who were pregnant prior to the pandemic. Individual- and community-level factors tied to socioeconomic inequality were associated with latent factors of COVID-19-related stress and adversity. Beyond objective adversity, subjective stress responses were strongly associated with depressive symptoms during the pandemic.

conclusionsHighlighting the role of subjective responses in vulnerability to prenatal depression and factors that influence susceptibility to COVID-19-related stress, these findings inform the allocation of resources to support recovery from this pandemic and future disease outbreaks. In addition to policies that mitigate disruptions to the environment due to the pandemic, treatments that focus on cognitions about the self and the environment may help to alleviate depressive symptoms in pregnant women.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansPandemicsPregnancySARS-CoV-2Stress, Psychologicaladversitydepressionpandemicpregnancystress

Identifiers

PMID33781354
PMCPMC8047399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.