ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2021
Debrief it all: a tool for inclusion of Safety-II.
Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies and tools to learn from work that goes well within healthcare patient safety practices: a mixed methods systematic review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- PEAK-II Trach: A Multi-Institutional Quality Improvement/Simulation Study Assessing Pediatric Emergency Readiness.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- How team debriefings can transform anaesthesia culture.BJA education · 2026Review
- Decisions, outcomes, and learning from what didn't go wrong.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026Article
- Exploring effects of resilience-focused debriefing on reflection and teamwork in interprofessional simulation-based education - a mixed method study.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Resilience-focused debriefing: addressing complexity in interprofessional simulation-based education-a design-based research study.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Open-access healthcare debriefing videos need to incorporate more Safety-II learnings.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of routine clinical debriefings and incident reports: insights for patient safety and teamwork enhancement.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025Article
- Improving cross-learning in clinical teams using daily on-site reflective meetings.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Harnessing In Situ Simulation to Identify Human Errors and Latent Safety Threats in Adult Tracheostomy Care.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2024Article
- Faculty development for translational simulation: a qualitative study of current practice.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2023Article
- Learning tools used to translate resilience in healthcare into practice: a rapid scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- A success story of clinical debriefings: lessons learned to promote impact and sustainability.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- The role of collaborative learning in resilience in healthcare-a thematic qualitative meta-synthesis of resilience narratives.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Developing adaptive performance: A conceptual model to guide simulation-based training design.AEM education and training · 2022Article
- "Debriefing and Organizational Lessons Learned" (DOLL): A Qualitative Study to Develop a Classification Framework for Reporting Clinical Debriefing Results.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Safety science in healthcare has historically focused primarily on reducing risk and minimizing harm by learning everything possible from when things go wrong (Safety-I). Safety-II encourages the study of all events, including the routine and mundane, not only bad outcomes. While debriefing and learning from positive events is not uncommon or new to simulation, many common debriefing strategies are more focused on Safety-I. The lack of inclusion of Safety-II misses out on the powerful analysis of everyday work.A debriefing tool highlighting Safety-II concepts was developed through expert consensus and piloting and is offered as a guide to encourage and facilitate inclusion of Safety-II analysis into debriefings. It allows for debriefing expansion from the focus on error analysis and "what went wrong" or "could have gone better" to now also capture valuable discussion of high yield Safety-II concepts such as capacities, adjustments, variation, and adaptation for successful operations in a complex system. Additionally, debriefing inclusive of Safety-II fosters increased debriefing overall by encouraging debriefing when "things go right", not historically what is most commonly debriefed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.