Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781320›Full record

ReviewStem cell research & therapy2021

Any closer to successful therapy of multiple myeloma? CAR-T cell is a good reason for optimism.

Faroogh Marofi, Safa Tahmasebi, Heshu Sulaiman Rahman, Denis Kaigorodov, Alexander Markov, Alexei Valerievich Yumashev, Navid Shomali, Max Stanley Chartrand, Yashwant Pathak, Rebar N Mohammed and 3 more

Expression of concernErratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Recent advances in CAR-T cell therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Precision Medicine in Therapy of Non-solid Cancer.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Faroogh MarofiDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Safa TahmasebiDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Heshu Sulaiman RahmanDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Suleimanyah, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.
Denis KaigorodovDirector of Research Institute "MitoKey", Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Alexander MarkovTyumen State Medical University, Tyumen, Russian Federation.
Alexei Valerievich YumashevDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Trubetskaya St., 8-2, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119991.
Navid ShomaliDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Max Stanley ChartrandDigiCare Behavioral Research, Casa Grande, AZ, USA.
Yashwant PathakFaculty Affairs, Taneja College of Pharmacy, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Rebar N MohammedBone Marrow Transplant Center, Hiwa Cancer Hospital, Suleimanyah, Iraq.
Mostafa JarahianToxicology and Chemotherapy Unit (G401), German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Roza MotavalliStem Cell Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Rozamotavalli@gmail.com.
Farhad Motavalli KhiaviDepartment of Virology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran. farhad.motavalli@gmail.com.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRAirlangga University · IDGerman Cancer Research Center · DEPasteur Institute of Iran · IRSechenov University · RUTyumen State Medical University · RUUniversity of Sulaimani · IQZanjan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite many recent advances on cancer novel therapies, researchers have yet a long way to cure cancer. They have to deal with tough challenges before they can reach success. Nonetheless, it seems that recently developed immunotherapy-based therapy approaches such as adoptive cell transfer (ACT) have emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy against various kinds of tumors even the cancers in the blood (liquid cancers). The hematological (liquid) cancers are hard to be targeted by usual cancer therapies, for they do not form localized solid tumors. Until recently, two types of ACTs have been developed and introduced; tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells which the latter is the subject of our discussion. It is interesting about engineered CAR-T cells that they are genetically endowed with unique cancer-specific characteristics, so they can use the potency of the host immune system to fight against either solid or liquid cancers. Multiple myeloma (MM) or simply referred to as myeloma is a type of hematological malignancy that affects the plasma cells. The cancerous plasma cells produce immunoglobulins (antibodies) uncontrollably which consequently damage the tissues and organs and break the immune system function. Although the last few years have seen significant progressions in the treatment of MM, still a complete remission remains unconvincing. MM is a medically challenging and stubborn disease with a disappointingly low rate of survival rate. When comparing the three most occurring blood cancers (i.e., lymphoma, leukemia, and myeloma), myeloma has the lowest 5-year survival rate (around 40%). A low survival rate indicates a high mortality rate with difficulty in treatment. Therefore, novel CAR-T cell-based therapies or combination therapies along with CAT-T cells may bring new hope for multiple myeloma patients. CAR-T cell therapy has a high potential to improve the remission success rate in patients with MM. To date, many preclinical and clinical trial studies have been conducted to investigate the ability and capacity of CAR T cells in targeting the antigens on myeloma cells. Despite the problems and obstacles, CAR-T cell experiments in MM patients revealed a robust therapeutic potential. However, several factors might be considered during CAR-T cell therapy for better response and reduced side effects. Also, incorporating the CAT-T cell method into a combinational treatment schedule may be a promising approach. In this paper, with a greater emphasis on CAR-T cell application in the treatment of MM, we will discuss and introduce CAR-T cell's history and functions, their limitations, and the solutions to defeat the limitations and different types of modifications on CAR-T cells.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenHumansImmunotherapyImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdoptive cell therapyCAR-T cellsHematological malignancyMultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID33781320
PMCPMC8008571
OpenAlexW3145213688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.