Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781299›Full record

SynthesisScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2021

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training strategies in the times of COVID-19: a systematic literature review comparing different training methodologies.

Daniyal Mansoor Ali, Butool Hisam, Natasha Shaukat, Noor Baig, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Jonathan L Epstein, Eric Goralnick, Paul D Kivela, Bryan McNally, Junaid Razzak

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniyal Mansoor AliCentre of Excellence Trauma and Emergencies, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. daniyal.mansoor@aku.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5466-6065
Butool HisamCentre of Excellence Trauma and Emergencies, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Natasha ShaukatCentre of Excellence Trauma and Emergencies, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Noor BaigCentre of Excellence Trauma and Emergencies, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Marcus Eng Hock OngDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Jonathan L EpsteinEmergency Care Safety Institute, Public Safety Group, Burlington, MA, USA.
Eric GoralnickDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Paul D KivelaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA.
Bryan McNallyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Junaid RazzakCentre of Excellence Trauma and Emergencies, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional, instructor led, in-person training of CPR skills has become more challenging due to COVID-19 pandemic. We compared the learning outcomes of standard in-person CPR training (ST) with alternative methods of training such as hybrid or online-only training (AT) on CPR performance, quality, and knowledge among laypersons with no previous CPR training.

methodsWe searched PubMed and Google Scholar for relevant articles from January 1995 to May 2020. Covidence was used to review articles by two independent researchers. Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool was used to assess quality of the manuscripts.

resultsOf the 978 articles screened, twenty met the final inclusion criteria. All included studies had an experimental design and moderate to strong global quality rating. The trainees in ST group performed better on calling 911, time to initiate chest compressions, hand placement and chest compression depth. Trainees in AT group performed better in assessing scene safety, calling for help, response time including initiating first rescue breathing, adequate ventilation volume, compression rates, shorter hands-off time, confidence, willingness to perform CPR, ability to follow CPR algorithm, and equivalent or better knowledge retention than standard teaching methodology.

conclusionAT methods of CPR training provide an effective alternative to the standard in-person CPR for large scale public training.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicLearningPandemicsCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCOVID-19Education, MedicalHumansSARS-CoV-2Alternative CPR trainingBasic life support (BLS)CPR training methodologiesHybrid CPR trainingLaypersonOnline CPR trainingStandard CPR training

Identifiers

PMID33781299
PMCPMC8006111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.