Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781284›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2021

Audit and feedback with or without training in-practice targeting antibiotic prescribing (TiPTAP): a study protocol of a cluster randomised trial in dental primary care.

Beatriz Goulao, Claire Scott, Irene Black, Jan Clarkson, Lee McArthur, Craig Ramsay, Linda Young, Eilidh Duncan

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Antibiotics in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of the Evidence beyond the Myth.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  5. Moving the needle on dental antibiotic overuse in Canada post COVID-19.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beatriz GoulaoHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland. beatriz.goulao@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1490-7183
Claire ScottNHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Irene BlackNHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Jan ClarksonNHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Lee McArthurNHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Craig RamsayHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.
Linda YoungNHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Eilidh DuncanHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.
NHS Education for Scotland · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance is an increasingly serious threat to global public health and patient safety. Overuse of antibiotics has aggravated this issue. Around 7% of all antibiotics in Scotland are prescribed by dentists. Audit and feedback has been shown to decrease these prescriptions, but there is evidence that dentists still prescribe unnecessarily. Our aim is to compare the effectiveness of a theory-informed in-practice training session (TiPTAP) in addition to individualised audit and feedback, with audit and feedback alone for reducing antibiotic prescribing by NHS dentists working in NHS primary care dental practices.

methodsWe will conduct a 2-arm parallel cluster randomised trial: out of 228 practices, 114 will be randomised to the theory-informed in-practice training session targeting antibiotic prescribing and individualised audit and feedback; 114 practices will be randomised to audit and feedback alone. The theory-informed session will include (a) an introductory session including several behaviour change techniques; (b) problem solving discussion, setting and recording action plans; (c) practice-level prescribing feedback discussion. The primary outcome is the number of antibiotic items per 100 NHS treatment claims over a 1-year period post-randomisation for each dentist. Secondary outcomes are the number of amoxicillin 3 g and broad spectrum antibiotics prescribed per 100 NHS treatment claims over a 1-year period; amoxicillin 3 g and broad spectrum antibiotics defined daily doses of antibiotics per 100 claims. Process measures include fidelity, knowledge, and confidence. Primary and secondary outcomes will be obtained using routine data. DISCUSSION: This study provides the opportunity to robustly assess the effect of adding an in-practice training co-intervention to audit and feedback. Its behaviour change theory-informed content will allow replication of the different components and can inform future training interventions.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN12345678 . Registered 18 June 2020.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPrimary Health CareFeedbackHumansInappropriate PrescribingPatient SafetyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicScotlandAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic prescriptionAudit and feedbackCluster randomised trialImplementationQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID33781284
PMCPMC8007384
OpenAlexW3140733037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.