Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781279›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of surgical oncology2021

New classifications of axillary lymph nodes and their anatomical-clinical correlations in breast surgery.

Roberto Cirocchi, Maria Ida Amabile, Alessandro De Luca, Federico Frusone, Domenico Tripodi, Patrizia Gentile, Renata Tabola, Daniele Pironi, Flavio Forte, Massimo Monti and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Thyroid Diseases and Breast Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberto CirocchiDepartment of Surgical Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Maria Ida AmabileDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regine Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy. mariaida.amabile@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1294-9403
Alessandro De LucaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regine Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Federico FrusoneDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regine Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Domenico TripodiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regine Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Patrizia GentileDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regine Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Renata TabolaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Daniele PironiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regine Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Flavio ForteUrology Department, M.G. Vannini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Massimo MontiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regine Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Vito D'AndreaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regine Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Salvatore SorrentiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regine Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the last decade, two research groups, the French group by Clough et al. (Br J Surg. 97:1659-65, 2010) and the Chinese one by Li et al. (ISRN Oncol 2013:279013, 2013), proposed two types of classification of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer, identifying novel anatomic landmarks for dividing the axillary space in lymph node dissection. MAIN BODY: Knowledge of the exact location of the sentinel node helps to focus the surgical dissection and to reduce the morbidity of sentinel lymph node biopsy procedures, in particular the risk of arm lymphedema, without compromising sensitivity.

conclusionIn this article, we aimed at focusing on the clinical impact that the most recent classifications of axillary lymph nodes have obtained in literature, highlighting the importance of defining new demarcations to preserve the axillary lymph nodes as much as possible in breast surgery.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymph NodesAxillaHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionPrognosisSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAxillary lymph nodeBreast cancerBreast surgeryClough’s classificationLi’s classificationSentinel lymph node

Identifiers

PMID33781279
PMCPMC8008673
OpenAlexW3148021686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.