Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781278›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2021

Prevalence of second victims, risk factors and support strategies among young German physicians in internal medicine (SeViD-I survey).

Reinhard Strametz, Peter Koch, Anja Vogelgesang, Amie Burbridge, Hannah Rösner, Miriam Abloescher, Wolfgang Huf, Brigitte Ettl, Matthias Raspe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The second victim phenomenon´s impact in male and female healthcare workers: a scoping review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Reinhard StrametzWiesbaden Business School, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Bleichstraße 44, 65183, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Peter KochCentre of Excellence for Epidemiology and Health Services Research for Healthcare Professionals (CVcare), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Anja VogelgesangDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Amie BurbridgeDepartment of Acute Medicine, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, England.
Hannah RösnerWiesbaden Business School, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Bleichstraße 44, 65183, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Miriam AbloescherKarl Landsteiner Institute for Clinical Risk Management, Wolkersbergenstraße 1, 1130, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang HufKarl Landsteiner Institute for Clinical Risk Management, Wolkersbergenstraße 1, 1130, Vienna, Austria.
Brigitte EttlKarl Landsteiner Institute for Clinical Risk Management, Wolkersbergenstraße 1, 1130, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias RaspeCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. matthias.raspe@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3916-6297
Klinik Hietzing · ATRheinMain University of Applied Sciences · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecond victims, defined as healthcare team members being traumatised by an unanticipated clinical event or outcome, are frequent in healthcare. Evidence of this phenomenon in Germany, however, is sparse. Recently, we reported the first construction and validation of a German questionnaire. This study aimed to understand this phenomenon better in a sample of young (<= 35 years) German physicians.

methodsThe electronic questionnaire (SeViD-I survey) was administered for 6 weeks to a sample of young physicians in training for internal medicine or a subspecialty. All physicians were members of the German Society of Internal Medicine. The questionnaire had three domains - general experience, symptoms, and support strategies - comprising 46 items. Binary logistic regression models were applied to study the influence of various independent factors on the risk of becoming a second victim, the magnitude of symptoms and the time to self-perceived recovery.

resultsThe response rate was 18% (555/3047). 65% of the participants were female, the mean age was 32 years. 59% experienced second victim incidents in their career so far and 35% during the past 12 months. Events with patient harm and unexpected patient deaths or suicides were the most frequent key incidents. 12% of the participants reported that their self-perceived time to full recovery was more than 1 year or have never recovered. Being female was a risk factor for being a second victim (odds ratio (OR) 2.5) and experiencing a high symptom load (OR 2). Working in acute care was promoting a shorter duration to self-perceived recovery (OR 0.5). Support measures with an exceptionally high approval among second victims were the possibility to discuss emotional and ethical issues, prompt debriefing/crisis intervention after the incident and a safe opportunity to contribute insights to prevent similar events in the future.

conclusionThe second victim phenomenon is frequent among young German physicians in internal medicine. In general, these traumatic events have a potentially high impact on physician health and the care they deliver. A better understanding of second victim traumatisations in Germany and broad implementation of effective support programs are warranted.

Indexed as

Medical errorPrevalenceRisk factorsSecond victimSupport strategiesSymptomsTraumatisation

Identifiers

PMID33781278
PMCPMC8005860
OpenAlexW3142714627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.