Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781240›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Factors contributing to psychological distress in the working population, with a special reference to gender difference.

Satu Viertiö, Olli Kiviruusu, Maarit Piirtola, Jaakko Kaprio, Tellervo Korhonen, Mauri Marttunen, Jaana Suvisaari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
83.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 412 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Dysmenorrhea and psychological distress: a meta-analysis.Archives of women's mental health · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Satu ViertiöDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare in Finland (THL), Helsinki, Finland. satu.viertio@thl.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-8894-2056
Olli KiviruusuDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare in Finland (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
Maarit PiirtolaUniversity of Helsinki, Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki, Finland.
Jaakko KaprioUniversity of Helsinki, Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki, Finland.
Tellervo KorhonenUniversity of Helsinki, Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki, Finland.
Mauri MarttunenDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare in Finland (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
Jaana SuvisaariDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare in Finland (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FI

Funding

Academy of Finland 309117Academy of Finland 309119Academy of Finland 312073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological distress refers to non-specific symptoms of stress, anxiety and depression, and it is more common in women. Our aim was to investigate factors contributing to psychological distress in the working population, with a special reference to gender differences.

methodsWe used questionnaire data from the nationally representative Finnish Regional Health and Well-being Study (ATH) collected in the years 2012-2016 (target population participants aged 20 +, n = 96,668, response rate 53%), restricting the current analysis to those persons who were working full-time and under 65 of age (n = 34,468). Psychological distress was assessed using the Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5) (cut-off value <=52). We studied the following factors potentially associated with psychological distress: sociodemographic factors, living alone, having children under18 years of age, lifestyle-related factors, social support, helping others outside of the home and work-related factors. We used logistic regression analysis to examine association between having work-family conflict with the likelihood for psychological distress. We first performed the models separately for men and women. Then interaction by gender was tested in the combined data for those independent variables where gender differences appeared probable in the analyses conducted separately for men and women.

resultsWomen reported more psychological distress than men (11.0% vs. 8.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Loneliness, job dissatisfaction and family-work conflict were associated with the largest risk of psychological distress. Having children, active participation, being able to successfully combine work and family roles, and social support were found to be protective factors. A significant interaction with gender was found in only two variables: ignoring family due to being absorbed in one's work was associated with distress in women (OR 1.30 (95% CI 1.00-1.70), and mental strain of work in men (OR 2.71 (95% CI 1.66-4.41).

conclusionsSatisfying work, family life and being able to successfully combine the two are important sources of psychological well-being for both genders in the working population.

Indexed as

Psychological DistressSex CharacteristicsAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleStress, PsychologicalYoung AdultGenderNationally representative studyPsychological distressWork-family conflict

Identifiers

PMID33781240
PMCPMC8006634
OpenAlexW3150372151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.