Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781237›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2021

Implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in German mental health care (AKtiV): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial.

Johanna Baumgardt, Julian Schwarz, Andreas Bechdolf, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Martin Heinze, Johannes Hamann, Martin Holzke, Gerhard Längle, Janina Richter, Peter Brieger and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Becoming a Guest: On Proximity and Distance in Mental Health Home Treatment.Computer supported cooperative work : CSCW : an international journal · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Johanna Baumgardt *Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Vivantes Hospital Am Urban und Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany. johanna.baumgardt@vivantes.de.
Julian Schwarz *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Immanuel Clinic Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Andreas BechdolfDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Vivantes Hospital Am Urban und Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany.
Konstantinos NikolaidisDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Vivantes Hospital Am Urban und Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany.
Martin HeinzeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Immanuel Clinic Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Johannes Hamannkbo-Isar Amper Klinikum, Region München, Munich, Germany.
Martin HolzkeCenter for Psychiatry Suedwuerttemberg, Department of Psychiatry I, Ulm University, Ravensburg, Weissenau, Germany.
Gerhard LängleCenter for Psychiatry Suedwuerttemberg, Zwiefalten, Germany.
Janina RichterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Department of Medicine of the Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Peter Briegerkbo-Isar Amper Klinikum, Region München, Munich, Germany.
Reinhold KilianDepartment of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Günzburg, Germany.
Jürgen TimmUniversity of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Constance HirschmeierDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian Von Peter *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Immanuel Clinic Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Stefan Weinmann *Psychiatric Hospital and Rehabilitation Unit, Rudolf-Sophien-Stift, Stuttgart, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DEVivantes Klinikum · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEIsar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Bremen · DEUniversity of Melbourne · AUZentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg · DE

Funding

Federal Joint Committee/Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G-BA) VSF2_2019-108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last decades, many high-income countries have successfully implemented assertive outreach mental health services for acute care. Despite evidence that these services entail several benefits for service users, Germany has lagged behind and has been slow in implementing outreach services. In 2018, a new law enabled national mental health care providers to implement team-based crisis intervention services on a regular basis, allowing for different forms of Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT). IEHT is similar to the internationally known Home Treatment or Crisis Resolution Teams. It provides acute psychiatric treatment at the user's home, similar to inpatient hospital treatment in terms of content, flexibility, and complexity. METHODS/

designThe presented naturalistic, quasi-experimental cohort study will evaluate IEHT in ten hospitals running IEHT services in different German regions. Within a multi-method research approach, it will evaluate stakeholders' experiences of care, service use, efficacy, costs, treatment processes and implementation processes of IEHT from different perspectives. Quantitative surveys will be used to recruit 360 service users. Subsequently, 180 service users receiving IEHT will be compared with 180 matched statistical 'twins' receiving standard inpatient treatment. Assessments will take place at baseline as well as after 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is the hospital re-admission rate within 12 months. Secondary outcomes include the combined readmission rate, total number of inpatient hospital days, treatment discontinuation rate, quality of life, psycho-social functioning, job integration, recovery, satisfaction with care, shared decision-making, and treatment costs. Additionally, the study will assess the burden of care and satisfaction with care among relatives or informal caregivers. A collaborative research team made up of researchers with and without lived experience of mental distress will conduct qualitative investigations with service users, caregivers and IEHT staff teams to explore critical ingredients and interactions between implementation processes, treatment processes, and outcomes from a stakeholder perspective. DISCUSSION: By integrating outcome, process and implementation research as well as different stakeholder perspectives and experiences in one study, this trial captures the various facets of IEHT as a special form of home treatment. Therefore, it allows for an adequate, comprehensive evaluation on different levels of this complex intervention.

trial registrationTrial registrations: 1) German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS000224769. Registered December 3rd 2020, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do ; 2) ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT0474550 . Registered February 9th 2021.

Indexed as

Mental HealthQuality of LifeCohort StudiesGermanyHumansInpatientsCollaborative researchCommunity mental health careCoproductionCrisis resolution teamsHome treatmentInpatient-equivalent treatmentMixed methodsMulti-center studyUser involvement

Identifiers

PMID33781237
PMCPMC8008509
OpenAlexW4240681580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.