Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781222›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Understanding transitional care programs for older adults who experience delayed discharge: a scoping review.

Katherine S McGilton, Shirin Vellani, Alexandra Krassikova, Sheryl Robertson, Constance Irwin, Alexia Cumal, Jennifer Bethell, Elaine Burr, Margaret Keatings, Sandra McKay and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patient preferences and willingness to pay for transitional care in breast cancer: a discrete choice experiment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Decoding the persistence of delayed hospital discharge: An in-depth scoping review and insights from two decades.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine S McGiltonKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. kathy.mcgilton@uhn.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2470-9738
Shirin VellaniKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alexandra KrassikovaKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sheryl RobertsonKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Constance IrwinKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alexia CumalKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer BethellKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Elaine BurrCare Transitions, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Margaret KeatingsKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sandra McKayVisiting Homemakers Association Home Healthcare, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kathryn NicholVisiting Homemakers Association Home Healthcare, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Martine PutsLawrence S. Bloomberg, Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anita SinghOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Souraya SidaniDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAHealth Sciences North · CAMinistry of Health and Long Term Care · CAToronto Metropolitan University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) Operating Grant: Transitions in Care - Best and Wise Practices Grant BWP-163068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany hospitalized older adults cannot be discharged because they lack the health and social support to meet their post-acute care needs. Transitional care programs (TCPs) are designed to provide short-term and low-intensity restorative care to these older adults experiencing or at risk for delayed discharge. However, little is known about the contextual factors (i.e., patient, staff and environmental characteristics) that may influence the implementation and outcomes of TCPs. This scoping review aims to answer: 1) What are socio-demographic and/or clinical characteristics of older patients served by TCPs?; 2) What are the core components provided by TCPs?; and 3) What patient, caregiver, and health system outcomes have been investigated and what changes in these outcomes have been reported for TCPs?

methodsThe six-step scoping review framework and PRISMA-ScR checklist were followed. Studies were included if they presented models of TCPs and evaluated them in community-dwelling older adults (65+) experiencing or at-risk for delayed discharge. The data synthesis was informed by a framework, consistent with Donabedian's structure-process-outcome model.

resultsTCP patients were typically older women with multiple chronic conditions and some cognitive impairment, functionally dependent and living alone. The review identified five core components of TCPs: assessment; care planning and monitoring; treatment; discharge planning; and patient, family and staff education. The main outcomes examined were functional status and discharge destination. The results were discussed with a view to inform policy makers, clinicians and administrators designing and evaluating TCPs as a strategy for addressing delayed hospital discharges.

conclusionTCPs can influence outcomes for older adults, including returning home. TCPs should be designed to incorporate interdisciplinary care teams, proactively admit those at risk of delayed discharge, accommodate persons with cognitive impairment and involve care partners. Additional studies are required to investigate the contributions of TCPs within integrated health care systems.

Indexed as

Multiple Chronic ConditionsTransitional CareAgedCaregiversFemaleHospitalizationHumansPatient DischargeAgedComponentsDelayed dischargeOutcomesScoping reviewStructureTransitional care programs

Identifiers

PMID33781222
PMCPMC8008524
OpenAlexW3152070609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.