Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33781211›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

SPPB reference values and performance in assessing sarcopenia in community-dwelling Singaporeans - Yishun study.

Shuen Yee Lee, Pei Ling Choo, Benedict Wei Jun Pang, Lay Khoon Lau, Khalid Abdul Jabbar, Wei Ting Seah, Kenneth Kexun Chen, Tze Pin Ng, Shiou-Liang Wee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05872360 (A Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Trial to Investigate Effects of Amway Bundle Combination of Products on Osteoarthritis & Sarcopenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05872360 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Trial to Investigate Effects of Amway Bundle Combination of Products on Osteoarthritis & Sarcopenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmway (China) R&D CenterRan2023 to 2024Enrolled240ConditionsOsteoarthritis, SarcopeniaArmsBundle Group 1 with Nutrilite Lifestyle, Bundle Group 2 without Nutrilite Lifestyle, Control Group 1, Control Group 2 with Nutrilite Lifestyle
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Combined Psychoeducational and Exercise Training Intervention to Improve Mental Health and Physical Functioning in Late-Life: A Randomized Controlled Trial.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The SG90 cohort of the oldest-old in Singapore.European journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Prevention of Sarcopenia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuen Yee LeeFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore.
Pei Ling ChooFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore.
Benedict Wei Jun PangGeriatric Education and Research Institute (GERI), Singapore, Singapore.
Lay Khoon LauGeriatric Education and Research Institute (GERI), Singapore, Singapore.
Khalid Abdul JabbarGeriatric Education and Research Institute (GERI), Singapore, Singapore.
Wei Ting SeahGeriatric Education and Research Institute (GERI), Singapore, Singapore.
Kenneth Kexun ChenGeriatric Education and Research Institute (GERI), Singapore, Singapore.
Tze Pin NgGeriatric Education and Research Institute (GERI), Singapore, Singapore.
Shiou-Liang WeeFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore. weeshiouliang@gmail.com.
Geriatric Education and Research Institute · SGSingapore Institute of Technology · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is an established test of physical performance. We provide reference values for SPPB and determine SPPB performance and cut-offs in assessing sarcopenia for Asian community-dwelling older adults.

methodsFive hundred thirty-eight (57.8% women) community-dwelling adults aged 21-90 years were recruited. SPPB and its subtest scores and timings (8 ft. gait speed (GS), five-times repeated chair sit-to-stand (STS) and balance) were determined. Appendicular lean mass divided by height-squared, muscle strength (handgrip) and physical performance (6 m GS, STS and SPPB) were assessed to define sarcopenia for various Asian criteria. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to assess performance of SPPB and subtests in discriminating sarcopenia in adults aged ≥60 years. Optimal SPPB and GS subtest cut-offs for each sarcopenia criterion were determined by maximizing sensitivity and specificity.

resultsThe mean SPPB score was 11.6(SD 1.1) in men and 11.5(SD1.2) in women. Majority of participants(≥50%) aged 21-80 years achieved the maximum SPPB score. SPPB total and subtest scores generally decreased with age (all p < 0.001), but did not differ between sex. Among older adults (≥60 years), SPPB and GS subtest had varied performance in assessing sarcopenia (AUC 0.54-0.64 and 0.51-0.72, respectively), and moderate-to-excellent performance in assessing severe sarcopenia (AUC 0.69-0.98 and 0.75-0.95, respectively), depending on sarcopenia definitions. The optimal cut-offs for discriminating sarcopenia in both sexes were SPPB ≤11points and GS subtest ≤1.0 m/s. The most common optimal cut-offs for discriminating severe sarcopenia according to various definitions were SPPB ≤11points in both sexes, and GS ≤0.9 m/s in men and ≤ 1.0 m/s in women.

conclusionsPopulation-specific normative SPPB values are important for use in diagnostic criteria and to interpret results of studies evaluating and establishing appropriate treatment goals. Performance on the SPPB should be reported in terms of the total sum score and registered time to complete the repeated-chair STS and 8-ft walk tests. The performance of GS subtest was comparable to SPPB and could be a useful, simple and accessible screening tool for discriminating severe sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults.

Indexed as

SarcopeniaAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHand StrengthHumansIndependent LivingMaleMuscle StrengthReference ValuesCut-offGait speedOlder adultsShort physical performance batterySit-to-standSPPB subtest

Identifiers

PMID33781211
PMCPMC8008740
OpenAlexW3134627226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.