ArticleClinical obesity2021
Reactions to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for the management of adolescent obesity: A multi-informant qualitative approach.
Article in Clinical obesity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Creating an adolescent intensive health behavior and lifestyle treatment for type 1 diabetes: Feedback from the target population.Obesity pillars · 2025Article
- Collaborating to support school reintegration following suicide-related crises: Voices from the field.Psychological services · 2025Article
- Formative Development of a Weight Management Intervention for Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity.Pediatric diabetes · 2023Article
- Controlling the obesity pandemic: Geoffrey Rose revisited.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2022Article
- Enabling Better Nutrition and Physical Activity for Adolescents from Middle Eastern Backgrounds: Focus Groups.Nutrients · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has set forth recommendations for clinicians to screen youth (6-18 years) for obesity. Those identified should be referred to comprehensive weight management programs consisting of at least 26 contact hours and focus on multiple targets of behaviour (ie, diet, physical activity, behaviour change). However, these recommendations are primarily based upon outcomes from randomized controlled trials and the feasibility of meeting these guidelines for adolescents in a clinical setting is unknown. The present study employed a multi-informant qualitative approach with adolescents, parents, and physicians, to identify and understand multiple perspectives on the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the USPSTF guidelines. In-depth interviews with seven adolescents, seven parents, and four physicians were analysed. Generally, participants viewed the guidelines positively but identified changes that may be necessary to increase the feasibility of adolescents engaging in programs that meet these guidelines. Participants also noted the importance of flexibility within programs, indicating that it would be difficult for many adolescents to participate in a program that was not tailored to their needs and resources. Future research should focus on adapting clinical weight management programs to meet both USPSTF guidelines and the needs of adolescents and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.