Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33780825›Full record

ArticleTicks and tick-borne diseases2021

Experience and knowledge of Lyme disease: A scoping review of patient-provider communication.

Anna T Nesgos, Laura C Harrington, Emily M Mader

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Ticks and tick-borne diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Perception of Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases Worldwide.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna T NesgosDepartment of Biological Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Electronic address: atn36@cornell.edu.
Laura C HarringtonNortheast Regional Center for Excellence in Vector-Borne Diseases, 3138 Comstock Hall, Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Electronic address: lch27@cornell.edu.
Emily M MaderNortheast Regional Center for Excellence in Vector-Borne Diseases, 3138 Comstock Hall, Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Electronic address: emm367@cornell.edu.
Cornell University · US

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been limited research on patient-provider communication dynamics regarding Lyme disease (LD) diagnosis and treatment. Evidence suggests communication in the clinical encounter improves when both patient and healthcare provider (HCP) have concordant orientations (or beliefs) on discussed topics, resulting in higher patient satisfaction and care outcomes. The purpose of this scoping review was to characterize and summarize current research findings on patient and provider knowledge and experiences regarding LD - two factors that may influence the orientation of both patients and providers toward LD in the clinical setting. None of the articles included in the review specifically addressed patient-provider interaction and relationships as the main objective. However, the existing literature indicates notable HCP uncertainty regarding LD diagnosis, treatment, and applied practice patterns. Current research also describes limited knowledge of LD among patient populations and a high prevalence of negative perceptions of care received in mainstream healthcare settings among individuals with persistent symptoms. We identified a critical gap in research that seeks to understand the dynamic of patients and HCPs communicating on the topic of LD in the clinical setting. Future research may identify opportunities where the patient-provider communication dynamic can be improved.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeProfessional-Patient RelationsHealth PersonnelHumansLyme DiseaseIllness experiencesKnowledgeLyme diseasePatient-provider communicationScoping review

Identifiers

PMID33780825
PMCPMC10044390
OpenAlexW3138742879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.