ArticleChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.)2021
Development of Respercise® a Digital Application for Standardizing Home Exercise in COPD Clinical Trials.
Article in Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Smartphone application-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Thorax · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Physical activity in COPD: a scoping review of methods and behaviour change techniques.ERJ open research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an important therapy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet uptake remains low. Intervention strategies which recapitulate the benefits of PR are, therefore, needed and digital, home-based therapies present opportunity in this space. Digital therapies also potentially offer an opportunity to standardize PR in clinical trials for new COPD therapies. AIMS AND
methodsWe aimed to create a digital application (app), Respercise
resultsFeedback from clinical trial participants was positive; 97% of respondents liked the app. A total of 88% of participants reported that it was easy to fit the exercises into their daily routine, and there was over 90% adherence for entering daily step counts. Notably, on day 90 both females and males using Respercise alone demonstrated a 2.22- and 2.27-seconds improvement in time for 5-repetition sit-to-stand tests respectively, above the 1.7 second threshold that is considered clinically meaningful in COPD.
conclusionsRespercise can be successfully deployed in clinical trials, offering the opportunity for standardization of exercise in clinical trials and, with further development, could have wider reach as a home-based intervention for individuals with COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.