Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33780463›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2021

Evaluation of the Arabin cervical pessary for prevention of preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy and short cervix (STOPPIT-2): An open-label randomised trial and updated meta-analysis.

Jane E Norman, John Norrie, Graeme MacLennan, David Cooper, Sonia Whyte, Sue Chowdhry, Sarah Cunningham-Burley, Xue W Mei, Joel B E Smith, Andrew Shennan and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02235181 (An Open Randomised Trial of the Arabin Pessary to Prevent Pre-term Birth in Twin Pregnancy in Woman With a Short Cervix), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02235181 nacompletednot on this map

An Open Randomised Trial of the Arabin Pessary to Prevent Pre-term Birth in Twin Pregnancy in Woman With a Short Cervix (STOPPIT-2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2014 to 2019Enrolled2,228ConditionsTwin Pregnancy With Antenatal ProblemArmsArabin Cervical Pessary
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Short cervix and use of cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in singleton and twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Management of twin pregnancies: Remaining challenges and unanswered questions.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  7. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Highlights from the International Twins Congress 2021.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2022
    Article
  17. A nomogram to predict preterm birth in twin pregnancies.American journal of translational research · 2022
    Article
  18. FIGO good practice recommendations on the use of pessary for reducing the frequency and improving outcomes of preterm birth.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Jane E NormanFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6031-6953
John NorrieEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9823-9252
Graeme MacLennanCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
David CooperCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9361-4399
Sonia WhyteTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0878-4244
Sue ChowdhryUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2766-1808
Sarah Cunningham-BurleyUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Xue W MeiNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6279-4884
Joel B E SmithNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5096-1462
Andrew ShennanDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5273-3132
Stephen C RobsonInstitute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7897-7987
Steven ThorntonBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Mark D KilbyFetal Medicine Centre, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust and College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Neil MarlowElizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5890-2953
Sarah J StockUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4308-856X
Phillip R BennettInstitute for Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jane DentonMultiple Births Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
STOPPIT-2 collaborative group
University of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBBirmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GBKing's College London · GBMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBNewcastle University · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBThe Multiple Births Foundation · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Department of Health BRC-1215-20008Department of Health HTA 13/04/22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm-labour-associated preterm birth is a common cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity in twin pregnancy. We aimed to test the hypothesis that the Arabin pessary would reduce preterm-labour-associated preterm birth by 40% or greater in women with a twin pregnancy and a short cervix. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted an open-label randomised controlled trial in 57 hospital antenatal clinics in the UK and Europe. From 1 April 2015 to 14 February 2019, 2,228 women with a twin pregnancy underwent cervical length screening between 18 weeks 0 days and 20 weeks 6 days of gestation. In total, 503 women with cervical length ≤ 35 mm were randomly assigned to pessary in addition to standard care (n = 250, mean age 32.4 years, mean cervical length 29 mm, with pessary inserted in 230 women [92.0%]) or standard care alone (n = 253, mean age 32.7 years, mean cervical length 30 mm). The pessary was inserted before 21 completed weeks of gestation and removed at between 35 and 36 weeks or before birth if earlier. The primary obstetric outcome, spontaneous onset of labour and birth before 34 weeks 0 days of gestation, was present in 46/250 (18.4%) in the pessary group compared to 52/253 (20.6%) following standard care alone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.87 [95% CI 0.55-1.38], p = 0.54). The primary neonatal outcome-a composite of any of stillbirth, neonatal death, periventricular leukomalacia, early respiratory morbidity, intraventricular haemorrhage, necrotising enterocolitis, or proven sepsis, from birth to 28 days after the expected date of delivery-was present in 67/500 infants (13.4%) in the pessary group compared to 76/506 (15.0%) following standard care alone (aOR 0.86 [95% CI 0.54-1.36], p = 0.50). The positive and negative likelihood ratios of a short cervix (≤35 mm) to predict preterm birth before 34 weeks were 2.14 and 0.83, respectively. A meta-analysis of data from existing publications (4 studies, 313 women) and from STOPPIT-2 indicated that a cervical pessary does not reduce preterm birth before 34 weeks in women with a short cervix (risk ratio 0.74 [95% CI 0.50-1.11], p = 0.15). No women died in either arm of the study; 4.4% of babies in the Arabin pessary group and 5.5% of babies in the standard treatment group died in utero or in the neonatal period (p = 0.53). Study limitations include lack of power to exclude a smaller than 40% reduction in preterm labour associated preterm birth, and to be conclusive about subgroup analyses.

conclusionsThese results led us to reject our hypothesis that the Arabin pessary would reduce the risk of the primary outcome by 40%. Smaller treatment effects cannot be ruled out.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN 02235181. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02235181.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicPregnancy, TwinAdolescentAdultBelgiumCervix UteriFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPessariesPregnancyPremature BirthUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33780463
PMCPMC8041194
OpenAlexW3141332331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.