Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33780444›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Predicting antimicrobial mechanism-of-action from transcriptomes: A generalizable explainable artificial intelligence approach.

Josh L Espinoza, Chris L Dupont, Aubrie O'Rourke, Sinem Beyhan, Pavel Morales, Amy Spoering, Kirsten J Meyer, Agnes P Chan, Yongwook Choi, William C Nierman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Mechanistic Studies of Antibacterial PNAs by RNA-Seq Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Perturbation-specific transcriptional mapping for unbiased target elucidation of antibiotics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Josh L EspinozaJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3447-3845
Chris L DupontJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Aubrie O'RourkeJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2890-1682
Sinem BeyhanJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0906-7538
Pavel MoralesJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Amy SpoeringNovoBiotic Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Kirsten J MeyerDepartment of Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9487-7361
Agnes P ChanJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
Yongwook ChoiJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4017-9669
William C NiermanJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
Kim LewisDepartment of Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1335-9982
Karen E NelsonJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
J. Craig Venter Institute · USNortheastern University · USNovoBiotic Pharmaceuticals · US

Funding

Uncultured bacteria for the discovery of novel antimicrobialsP01AI118687 · NIAID · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, KIM · 2016 to 2020
$8.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI118687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To better combat the expansion of antibiotic resistance in pathogens, new compounds, particularly those with novel mechanisms-of-action [MOA], represent a major research priority in biomedical science. However, rediscovery of known antibiotics demonstrates a need for approaches that accurately identify potential novelty with higher throughput and reduced labor. Here we describe an explainable artificial intelligence classification methodology that emphasizes prediction performance and human interpretability by using a Hierarchical Ensemble of Classifiers model optimized with a novel feature selection algorithm called Clairvoyance; collectively referred to as a CoHEC model. We evaluated our methods using whole transcriptome responses from Escherichia coli challenged with 41 known antibiotics and 9 crude extracts while depositing 122 transcriptomes unique to this study. Our CoHEC model can properly predict the primary MOA of previously unobserved compounds in both purified forms and crude extracts at an accuracy above 99%, while also correctly identifying darobactin, a newly discovered antibiotic, as having a novel MOA. In addition, we deploy our methods on a recent E. coli transcriptomics dataset from a different strain and a Mycobacterium smegmatis metabolomics timeseries dataset showcasing exceptionally high performance; improving upon the performance metrics of the original publications. We not only provide insight into the biological interpretation of our model but also that the concept of MOA is a non-discrete heuristic with diverse effects for different compounds within the same MOA, suggesting substantial antibiotic diversity awaiting discovery within existing MOA.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAlgorithmsAnti-Infective AgentsComputational BiologyDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliHumansMetabolomeMycobacterium smegmatisPhenylpropionatesTranscriptomeAnti-Infective AgentsdarobactinPhenylpropionates

Identifiers

PMID33780444
PMCPMC8031737
OpenAlexW3147618726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.