ArticleSub-cellular biochemistry2021
Are Dietary Extracellular Vesicles Bioavailable and Functional in Consuming Organisms?
Article in Sub-cellular biochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracellular Vesicles in Cardiac Cell Crosstalk: from Intercellular Communication to Clinical Translation.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- Microscopic messengers: Extracellular vesicles shaping gastrointestinal health and disease.Physiological reports · 2025Review
- Role of probiotic extracellular vesicles in inter-kingdom communication and current technical limitations in advancing their therapeutic utility.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2024Review
- Isolation and Characterization of Cow-, Buffalo-, Sheep- and Goat-Milk-Derived Extracellular Vesicles.Cells · 2023Article
- Potential Pathogenic Impact of Cow's Milk Consumption and Bovine Milk-Derived Exosomal MicroRNAs in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Extracellular Vesicles in Veterinary Medicine.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Milk Exosomal microRNAs: Postnatal Promoters of β Cell Proliferation but Potential Inducers of β Cell De-Differentiation in Adult Life.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been well established that diet influences the health status of the consuming organism. Recently, extracellular vesicles (EVs) present in dietary sources are proposed to be involved in cross-species and kingdom communication. As EVs contain a lipid bilayer and carry bioactive cargo of proteins and nucleic acids, they are proposed to survive harsh degrading conditions of the gut and enter systemic circulation. Following the bioavailability, several studies have supported the functional role of dietary EVs in various tissues of the consuming organism. Simultaneously, multiple studies have refuted the possibility that dietary EVs mediate cross-species communication and hence the topic is controversial. The feasibility of the concept remains under scrutiny primarily owing to the lack of significant in vivo evidence to complement the in vitro speculations. Concerns surrounding EV stability in the harsh degrading gut environment, lack of mechanism explaining intestinal uptake and bioavailability in systemic circulation have impeded the acceptance of their functional role. This chapter discusses the current evidences that support dietary EV-based cross species communication and enlists several issues that need to be addressed in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.