Trial reportTechniques in coloproctology2021
Fecobionics assessment of the effect of position on defecatory efficacy in normal subjects.
Trial report in Techniques in coloproctology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03317938 (Unraveling Anorectal Function and Biomarker Signatures in Patients Suffering From Subtypes of Defecatory Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Unraveling Anorectal Function and Biomarker Signatures in Patients Suffering From Subtypes of Defecatory Disorders
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resting and Squeeze Anal Pull-Through Assessments by Fecobionics Demonstrate Weak Anal Sphincters in Patients With Fecal Incontinence.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
- Bionic concepts for assessment of defecatory function and dysfunction.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Review
- Consistency of Feces Affects Defecatory Function.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2024Article
- The rectum, anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle show different contraction wave forms during prolonged measurement with a simulated feces.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Fecobionics in proctology: review and perspectives.Surgery open digestive advance · 2023Article
- Anorectal volume-pressure relations, contraction work, and flow during defecation.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2022Article
- Review of the indications, methods, and clinical utility of anorectal manometry and the rectal balloon expulsion test.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2022Review
- Fecobionics characterization of female patients with fecal incontinence.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Feasibility study of defecation studied with a wireless Fecobionics probe in normal subjects.Physiological reports · 2022Article
- Fecobionics Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDefecation is a complex process and up to 25% of the population suffer from symptoms of defecatory dysfunction. For functional testing, diagnostics, and therapy of anorectal disorders, it is important to know the optimal defecation position. is The aim of this study was to evaluate defecation pressure patterns in side lying, seated and squatting defecation positions in normal subjects using a simulated stool device called Fecobionics.
methodsThe Fecobionics expulsion parameters were assessed in an interventional study design conducted from May 29 to December 9 2019. Subjects were invited to participate in the study through advertisement at The Chinese University of Hong Kong. The Fecobionics device consisted of a core containing pressure sensors at the front (caudal end) and rear (cranial end) and a polyester-urethane bag spanning most of the core length which also contained sensors. The Fecobionics bag was distended to 50 ml in the rectum of normal subjects (no present and past symptoms of defecatory disorders, no prior abdominal surgery, medication or chronic diseases). Studies were done in side lying (left lateral recumbent position), seated (hip flexed 90°) and squatting position (hip flexed 25°). Pressure endpoints including the rear-front pressure diagram and defecation indices were compared between positions.
resultsTwelve subjects (6 females/6 males, mean age 26.3 ± 2.6 [19.0-48.0] years) were included and underwent the planned procedures. The resting anal pressure for side lying and seated positions were 33.1 ± 4.1 cmH
conclusionsThe delay in expelling the Fecobionics device in the lying position was associated with dyssynergic pressure patterns on the device. Quantitative differences were not found between the seated and squatting position. Trial Registration http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03317938.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33779850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.