Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33779850›Full record

Trial reportTechniques in coloproctology2021

Fecobionics assessment of the effect of position on defecatory efficacy in normal subjects.

S-C Chen, K Futaba, W W Leung, C Wong, T Mak, S Ng, H Gregersen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Techniques in coloproctology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03317938 (Unraveling Anorectal Function and Biomarker Signatures in Patients Suffering From Subtypes of Defecatory Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03317938 nacompletednot on this map

Unraveling Anorectal Function and Biomarker Signatures in Patients Suffering From Subtypes of Defecatory Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorGiomeRan2017 to 2024Enrolled236ConditionsFecal Incontinence, ConstipationArmsFecobionics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Consistency of Feces Affects Defecatory Function.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Fecobionics in proctology: review and perspectives.Surgery open digestive advance · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S-C ChenGIOME, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F, Clinical Sciences Building, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
K FutabaGIOME, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F, Clinical Sciences Building, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
W W LeungGIOME, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F, Clinical Sciences Building, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
C WongGIOME, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F, Clinical Sciences Building, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
T MakGIOME, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F, Clinical Sciences Building, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
S NgGIOME, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F, Clinical Sciences Building, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
H GregersenGIOME, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F, Clinical Sciences Building, Shatin, Hong Kong, China. hag@giome.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-2845

Funding

Chinese University of Hong Kong strategic recruitment funding)Health and Medical Research Fund 07180856Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee 14106717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefecation is a complex process and up to 25% of the population suffer from symptoms of defecatory dysfunction. For functional testing, diagnostics, and therapy of anorectal disorders, it is important to know the optimal defecation position. is The aim of this study was to evaluate defecation pressure patterns in side lying, seated and squatting defecation positions in normal subjects using a simulated stool device called Fecobionics.

methodsThe Fecobionics expulsion parameters were assessed in an interventional study design conducted from May 29 to December 9 2019. Subjects were invited to participate in the study through advertisement at The Chinese University of Hong Kong. The Fecobionics device consisted of a core containing pressure sensors at the front (caudal end) and rear (cranial end) and a polyester-urethane bag spanning most of the core length which also contained sensors. The Fecobionics bag was distended to 50 ml in the rectum of normal subjects (no present and past symptoms of defecatory disorders, no prior abdominal surgery, medication or chronic diseases). Studies were done in side lying (left lateral recumbent position), seated (hip flexed 90°) and squatting position (hip flexed 25°). Pressure endpoints including the rear-front pressure diagram and defecation indices were compared between positions.

resultsTwelve subjects (6 females/6 males, mean age 26.3 ± 2.6 [19.0-48.0] years) were included and underwent the planned procedures. The resting anal pressure for side lying and seated positions were 33.1 ± 4.1 cmH

conclusionsThe delay in expelling the Fecobionics device in the lying position was associated with dyssynergic pressure patterns on the device. Quantitative differences were not found between the seated and squatting position. Trial Registration http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03317938.

Indexed as

ConstipationRectal DiseasesAdultAnal CanalDefecationFemaleHumansMaleManometryRectumYoung AdultAnorectal physiologyDefecationFecobionicsFunctional testing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.