Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33779824›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2021

Impact of COVID-19 lockdown in patients with implantable cardioverter and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: insights from daily remote monitoring transmissions.

Giosuè Mascioli, Elena Lucca, Paola Napoli, Daniele Giacopelli

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Onset of the COVID-19 pandemic reduced active time in patients with implanted cardiac devices.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2022
    Article
  4. "Unlocking Physical Activity" During COVID-19 in Cardiac Device Patients.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The use of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices during the COVID-19 pandemic: an EHRA physician survey.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giosuè MascioliDepartment of Cardiology, Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, Via Mauro Gavazzeni, 21, 24125, Bergamo, Italy. giosue.mascioli@gavazzeni.it.
Elena LuccaDepartment of Cardiology, Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, Via Mauro Gavazzeni, 21, 24125, Bergamo, Italy.
Paola NapoliClinical Research Unit, Biotronik Italia, Vimodrone, Milano, Italy.
Daniele GiacopelliClinical Research Unit, Biotronik Italia, Vimodrone, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1584-7944
Humanitas Gavazzeni · ITMedtronic (Italy) · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Italy, a strict lockdown was imposed from 8 March 2020 to stop the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We explored the effect of this lockdown on data transmitted by remote monitoring (RM) of implantable cardioverter and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (ICDs/CRT-Ds). RM daily transmissions from ICDs and CRT-Ds were analyzed and compared in two consecutive 1 month frames pre and post-lockdown: period I (7 February-7 March 2020) and period II (8 March-7 April 2020). The study cohort included 180 patients (81.1% male, 63.3% ICDs and 36.7% CRT-Ds) with a median age of 70 (interquartile range 62-78) years. The median value of physical activity provided by accelerometric sensors showed a significant reduction between period I and II [13.1% (8.2-18.1%) versus 9.4% (6.3-13.8%), p < 0.001]. Eighty nine % of patients decreased their activity, for 43.3% the relative reduction was ≥ 25%. The mean heart rate decreased significantly [69.2 (63.8-75.6) bpm vs 67.9 (62.7-75.3) bpm, p < 0.001], but with greater reduction (≈3 beats/minute) in patients aged < 70 years. Resting heart rate and thoracic impedance showed minor variations. No differences were observed in device pacing % and arrhythmias. In cardiac patients, the lockdown imposed to contain COVID-19 outbreak significantly reduced the amount of physical activity and the mean heart rate. These side effects of in-home confinement quarantine should be taken in consideration for frail patients.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyCardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesCOVID-19Defibrillators, ImplantableRemote Sensing TechnologyActigraphyAgedArrhythmias, CardiacElectric CountershockExerciseFemaleHealth StatusHeart RateHumansItalyMaleCardiac resynchronization therapyCOVID-19Implantable cardioverter defibrillatorLockdownRemote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID33779824
PMCPMC8006504
OpenAlexW3148971047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.