ArticleExperimental brain research2021
Individual motion perception parameters and motion sickness frequency sensitivity in fore-aft motion.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subjective visual vertical in first time seafarers experiencing sea sickness.Journal of otology · 2025Article
- Theoretical considerations on models of vestibular self-motion perception as inherent in computational frameworks of motion sickness.Biological cybernetics · 2025Article
- Reducing motion sickness during simulated astronaut post-spaceflight water landings using anticipatory cues or postural control.NPJ microgravity · 2025Article
- Validating sensory conflict theory and mitigating motion sickness in humans with galvanic vestibular stimulation.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- Visually induced motion sickness correlates with on-road car sickness while performing a visual task.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Personalizing motion sickness models: estimation and statistical modeling of individual-specific parameters.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2025Article
- A computational model of motion sickness dynamics during passive self-motion in the dark.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- The role of vision in sensory integration models for predicting motion perception and sickness.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Virtual reality as a countermeasure for astronaut motion sickness during simulated post-flight water landings.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- A computational model of motion sickness dynamics during passive self-motion in the dark.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- Validating models of sensory conflict and perception for motion sickness prediction.Biological cybernetics · 2023Article
- Comparative Study of Cooperative Platoon Merging Control Based on Reinforcement Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Neck stabilization through sensory integration of vestibular and visual motion cues.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Relating individual motion sickness levels to subjective discomfort ratings.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Normative data for rotational chair considering motion susceptibility.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Amplitude and Temporal Dynamics of Motion Sickness.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous literature suggests a relationship between individual characteristics of motion perception and the peak frequency of motion sickness sensitivity. Here, we used well-established paradigms to relate motion perception and motion sickness on an individual level. We recruited 23 participants to complete a two-part experiment. In the first part, we determined individual velocity storage time constants from perceived rotation in response to Earth Vertical Axis Rotation (EVAR) and subjective vertical time constants from perceived tilt in response to centrifugation. The cross-over frequency for resolution of the gravito-inertial ambiguity was derived from our data using the Multi Sensory Observer Model (MSOM). In the second part of the experiment, we determined individual motion sickness frequency responses. Participants were exposed to 30-minute sinusoidal fore-aft motions at frequencies of 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 Hz, with a peak amplitude of 2 m/s
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.