Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33779746›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Association Between Socioeconomic Status and In Utero Fetal Brain Development.

Yuan-Chiao Lu, Kushal Kapse, Nicole Andersen, Jessica Quistorff, Catherine Lopez, Andrea Fry, Jenhao Cheng, Nickie Andescavage, Yao Wu, Kristina Espinosa and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep learning assessment of fetal brain maturation on 3D ultrasound volumes in early-onset fetal growth restriction.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Social Determinants of Health, the developing brain, and risk and resilience for psychopathology.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Social Determinants of Health and Early Brain Development.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuan-Chiao LuDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Kushal KapseDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Nicole AndersenDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Jessica QuistorffDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Catherine LopezDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Andrea FryDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Jenhao ChengDepartment of Quality and Patient Safety, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Nickie AndescavageDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Yao WuDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Kristina EspinosaDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Gilbert VezinaDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Adre du PlessisPrenatal Pediatrics Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Catherine LimperopoulosDeveloping Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
Children's National · USGeorge Washington University · USNational Patient Safety Foundation · US

Funding

Antecedents of Impaired Brain Development in Fetuses with Heart DiseaseR01HL116585 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LIMPEROPOULOS, CATHERINE · 2013 to 2017
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Children raised in settings with lower parental socioeconomic status are at increased risk for neuropsychological disorders. However, to date, the association between socioeconomic status and fetal brain development remains poorly understood. Objective: To determine the association between parental socioeconomic status and in vivo fetal brain growth and cerebral cortical development using advanced, 3-dimensional fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of fetal brain development enrolled 144 healthy pregnant women from 2 low-risk community obstetrical hospitals from 2012 through 2019 in the District of Columbia. Included women had a prenatal history without complications that included recommended screening laboratory and ultrasound studies. Exclusion criteria were multiple gestation pregnancy, known or suspected congenital infection, dysmorphic features of the fetus, and documented chromosomal abnormalities. T2-weighted fetal brain magnetic resonance images were acquired. Each pregnant woman was scanned at up to 2 points in the fetal period. Data were analyzed from June through November 2020. Exposures: Parental education level and occupation status were documented. Main Outcomes and Measures: Regional fetal brain tissue volume (for cortical gray matter, white matter, cerebellum, deep gray matter, and brainstem) and cerebral cortical features (ie, lobe volume, local gyrification index, and sulcal depth) in the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes were calculated. Results: Fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging studies were performed among 144 pregnant women (median [interquartile range] age, 32.5 [27.0-36.1] years) with gestational age from 24.0 to 39.4 weeks; 75 fetuses (52.1%) were male, and 69 fetuses (47.9%) were female. Higher parental education level was associated with significantly increased volume in the fetal white matter (mothers: β, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.26 to 4.45; P = .001; fathers: β, 2.39; 95% CI, 0.97 to 3.81; P = .001), deep gray matter (mothers: β, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.32; P = .048; fathers: β, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.31; P = .02), and brainstem (mothers: β, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.10; P = .01; fathers: β, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.004 to 0.08; P = .03). Higher maternal occupation status was associated with significantly increased volume in the fetal white matter (β, 2.07; 95% CI, 0.88 to 3.26; P = .001), cerebellum (β, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.29; P = .01), and brainstem (β, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.001 to 0.07; P = .04), and higher paternal occupation status was associated with significantly increased white matter volume (β, 1.98; 95% CI, 0.71 to 3.25; P < .01). However, higher socioeconomic status was associated with significantly decreased fetal cortical gray matter volume (mothers: β, -0.11; 95% CI, -0.18 to -0.03; P = .01; fathers: β, -0.10; 95% CI, -0.18 to -0.03; P = .01). Higher parental socioeconomic status was associated with increased volumes of 3 brain lobes of white matter: frontal lobe (mothers: β, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.13; P = .01; fathers: β, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.11; P = .03), parietal lobe (mothers: β, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.11; P < .001; fathers: β, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.10; P = .001), and temporal lobe (mothers: β, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07; P < .001; fathers: β, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07; P < .001), and maternal SES score was associated with significantly decreased volume in the occipital lobe (β, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.04; P = .03). Higher parental socioeconomic status was associated with decreased cortical local gyrification index (for example, for the frontal lobe, mothers: β, -1.1; 95% CI, -1.9 to -0.3; P = .01; fathers: β, -0.8; 95% CI, -1.6 to -0.1; P = .03) and sulcal depth, except for the frontal lobe (for example, for the parietal lobe, mothers: β, -9.5; 95% CI, -13.8 to -5.3; P < .001; fathers: β, -8.7; 95% CI, -13.0 to -4.4; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found an association between parental socioeconomic status and altered in vivo fetal neurodevelopment. While being born and raised in a lower socioeconomic status setting is associated with poorer neuropsychological, educational, and socioeconomic outcomes in children, these findings suggest that altered prenatal programming may be associated with these outcomes and that future targeted prenatal interventions may be needed.

Indexed as

Fetal DevelopmentAdultBrainFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingPregnancyReference ValuesSocial Class

Identifiers

PMID33779746
PMCPMC8008281
OpenAlexW3151860586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.