Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33779717›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2021

Imaging surveillance after open aortic repair: a feasibility study of three-dimensional growth mapping.

Yunus Ahmed, Nitesh Nama, Ignas B Houben, Joost A van Herwaarden, Frans L Moll, David M Williams, C Alberto Figueroa, Himanshu J Patel, Nicholas S Burris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Three-dimensional aortic geometry mapping via registration of non-gated contrast-enhanced or gated and respiratory-navigated MR angiographies.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yunus AhmedDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6036-8929
Nitesh NamaDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5249-4992
Ignas B HoubenDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8975-528X
Joost A van HerwaardenDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Frans L MollDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
David M WilliamsDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
C Alberto FigueroaDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3934-6506
Himanshu J PatelDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7639-2416
Nicholas S BurrisDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5198-4383

Funding

Vascular Deformation Mapping (VDM) for Automated, 3D Assessment of Thoracic Aortic AneurysmR44HL145953 · NHLBI · IMBIO, LLC · PI BURRIS, NICHOLAS SCOTT, HATT, CHARLES R · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 20POST35220004NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL143671NHLBI NIH HHS R44 HL145953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesConfident growth assessment during imaging follow-up is often limited by substantial variability of diameter measurements and the fact that growth does not always occur at standard measurement locations. There is a need for imaging-based techniques to more accurately assess growth. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of a three-dimensional aortic growth assessment technique to quantify aortic growth in patients following open aortic repair.

methodsThree-dimensional aortic growth was measured using vascular deformation mapping (VDM), a technique which quantifies the localized rate of volumetric growth at the aortic wall, expressed in units of Jacobian (J) per year. We included 16 patients and analysed 6 aortic segments per patient (96 total segments). Growth was assessed by 3 metrics: clinically reported diameters, Jacobian determinant and targeted diameter re-measurements.

resultsVDM was able to clearly depict the presence or absence of localized aortic growth and allows for an assessment of the distribution of growth and its relation to anatomic landmarks (e.g. anastomoses, branch arteries). Targeted diameter change showed a stronger and significant correlation with J (r = 0.20, P = 0.047) compared to clinical diameter change (r = 0.15, P = 0.141). Among 20/96 (21%) segments with growth identified by VDM, growth was confirmed by clinical measurements in 7 and targeted re-measurements in 11. Agreement of growth assessments between VDM and diameter measurements was slightly higher for targeted re-measurements (kappa = 0.38) compared to clinical measurements (kappa = 0.25).

conclusionsAortic growth is often uncertain and underappreciated when assessed via standard diameter measurements. Three-dimensional growth assessment with VDM offers a more comprehensive assessment of growth, allows for targeted diameter measurements and could be an additional tool to determine which post-surgical patients at high and low risk for future complications.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalEndovascular ProceduresAortaFeasibility StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAortic growthImaging surveillanceOpen aortic aneurysm repairThoracic aortic aneurysmVascular deformation mapping

Identifiers

PMID33779717
PMCPMC8434871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.