Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33779510›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2021

Perspective: targeting VEGF-A and YKL-40 in glioblastoma - matter matters.

Camilla Bjørnbak Holst, Henriette Pedersen, Elisabeth Anne Adanma Obara, Kristoffer Vitting-Seerup, Kamilla Ellermann Jensen, Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen, Eva Løbner Lund, Hans Skovgaard Poulsen, Julia Sidenius Johansen, Petra Hamerlik

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla Bjørnbak HolstDepartment of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Henriette PedersenBrain Tumor Biology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elisabeth Anne Adanma ObaraBrain Tumor Biology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristoffer Vitting-SeerupBrain Tumor Biology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6450-0608
Kamilla Ellermann JensenBrain Tumor Biology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jane Skjøth-RasmussenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-9704
Eva Løbner LundDepartment of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hans Skovgaard PoulsenDepartment of Radiation Biology, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Julia Sidenius JohansenDepartment of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Petra HamerlikBrain Tumor Biology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Danish Cancer Society · DKRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastomas (GBM) are heterogeneous highly vascular brain tumors exploiting the unique microenvironment in the brain to resist treatment and anti-tumor responses. Anti-angiogenic agents, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy have been studied extensively in GBM patients over a number of decades with minimal success. Despite maximal efforts, prognosis remains dismal with an overall survival of approximately 15 months.Bevacizumab, a humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody, underwent accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2009 for the treatment of recurrent GBM based on promising preclinical and early clinical studies. Unfortunately, subsequent clinical trials did not find overall survival benefit. Pursuing pleiotropic targets and leaning toward multitarget strategies may be a key to more effective therapeutic intervention in GBM, but preclinical evaluation requires careful consideration of model choices. In this study, we discuss bevacizumab resistance, dual targeting of pro-angiogenic modulators VEGF and YKL-40 in the context of brain tumor microenvironment, and how model choice impacts study conclusions and its translational significance.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsChitinase-3-Like Protein 1Drug Delivery SystemsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGlioblastomaHumansMiceMice, Inbred NODTumor MicroenvironmentVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabCHI3L1 protein, humanChitinase-3-Like Protein 1Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanAngiogenesisglioblastomamouse modelsVEGFYKL-40

Identifiers

PMID33779510
PMCPMC8078714
OpenAlexW3139607129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.