ArticlePsychological assessment2021
The self- and informant-personality inventories for ICD-11: Agreement, structure, and relations with health, social, and satisfaction variables in older adults.
Article in Psychological assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Dimensions Be Categorically Specified?Personality and mental health · 2026Article
- Variations in maladaptive personality patterns and depressive symptoms' severity across personality functioning profiles in a community sample.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Longitudinal measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 across Black and White American older adults.Psychological assessment · 2026Article
- Dysfunctional personality traits and body image in orthopedic surgery patients at risk of postoperative psychological distress.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Wherefrom and Whither PD? Recent Developments and Future Possibilities in DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Diagnosis.Current psychiatry reports · 2025Review
- Development and validation of the short form of the Parker personality measure among Chinese college students.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Practical implications of ICD-11 personality disorder classifications.BMC psychiatry · 2024Review
- Cross-walking personality disorder types to ICD-11 trait domains: An overview of current findings.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Review
- Six-month stability and predictive validity of the personality inventory for ICD-11.BMC psychology · 2022Article
- Clinical Implications of ICD-11 for Diagnosing and Treating Personality Disorders.Current psychiatry reports · 2022Review
- Preliminary Scales forFrontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Editorial: Entering the Brave New World of ICD-11 Personality Disorder Diagnosis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The International Classification of Diseases-11th Edition (ICD-11) includes a dimensional trait model of personality disorder. The Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) was the first self-report measure developed for its assessment. The present study examines the validity of an informant-report version of the PiCD, the Informant-Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (the IPiC), and is the first study to test self-other agreement, ratings from close others, and the criterion validity of both the IPiC and the PiCD for several popular and well-validated measures of life functioning: Life and romantic relationship satisfaction, social support, physical and mental health, depressive symptoms, insomnia symptoms, and cognitive decline. The present study is also the first to examine the IPiC and PiCD in a sample of older adults in the community. Results suggest that the IPiC and the PiCD show moderate self-other agreement, are associated significantly with several important life functioning areas, and have structural validity even at the item level. Further replication and validation are necessary for these instruments, but the IPiC and the PiCD have shown strong validation evidence to date, now including evidence of consensual and criterion validity, in addition to structural validity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.