ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2021
Balancing Data on Deep Learning-Based Proteochemometric Activity Classification.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph-Based Bidirectional Transformer Decision Threshold Adjustment Algorithm for Class-Imbalanced Molecular Data.Journal of computational biophysics and chemistry · 2024Article
- QSPRpred: a Flexible Open-Source Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Modelling Tool.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- A multi-center big-data approach for precise PICC-RVT prognosis and identification of major risk factors in clinical practice.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Methods for Small Data Challenges in Molecular Science.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In silico analysis of biological activity data has become an essential technique in pharmaceutical development. Specifically, the so-called proteochemometric models aim to share information between targets in machine learning ligand-target activity prediction models. However, bioactivity data sets used in proteochemometric modeling are usually imbalanced, which could potentially affect the performance of the models. In this work, we explored the effect of different balancing strategies in deep learning proteochemometric target-compound activity classification models while controlling for the compound series bias through clustering. These strategies were (1) no_resampling, (2) resampling_after_clustering, (3) resampling_before_clustering, and (4) semi_resampling. These schemas were evaluated in kinases, GPCRs, nuclear receptors, and proteases from BindingDB. We observed that the predicted proportion of positives was driven by the actual data balance in the test set. Additionally, it was confirmed that data balance had an impact on the performance estimates of the proteochemometric model. We recommend a combination of data augmentation and clustering in the training set (semi_resampling) to mitigate the data imbalance effect in a realistic scenario. The code of this analysis is publicly available at https://github.com/b2slab/imbalance_pcm_benchmark.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.