Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33779173›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2021

Balancing Data on Deep Learning-Based Proteochemometric Activity Classification.

Angela Lopez-Del Rio, Sergio Picart-Armada, Alexandre Perera-Lluna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angela Lopez-Del RioB2SLab, Departament d'Enginyeria de Sistemes, Automàtica i Informàtica Industrial, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5486-7465
Sergio Picart-ArmadaB2SLab, Departament d'Enginyeria de Sistemes, Automàtica i Informàtica Industrial, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Alexandre Perera-LlunaB2SLab, Departament d'Enginyeria de Sistemes, Automàtica i Informàtica Industrial, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In silico analysis of biological activity data has become an essential technique in pharmaceutical development. Specifically, the so-called proteochemometric models aim to share information between targets in machine learning ligand-target activity prediction models. However, bioactivity data sets used in proteochemometric modeling are usually imbalanced, which could potentially affect the performance of the models. In this work, we explored the effect of different balancing strategies in deep learning proteochemometric target-compound activity classification models while controlling for the compound series bias through clustering. These strategies were (1) no_resampling, (2) resampling_after_clustering, (3) resampling_before_clustering, and (4) semi_resampling. These schemas were evaluated in kinases, GPCRs, nuclear receptors, and proteases from BindingDB. We observed that the predicted proportion of positives was driven by the actual data balance in the test set. Additionally, it was confirmed that data balance had an impact on the performance estimates of the proteochemometric model. We recommend a combination of data augmentation and clustering in the training set (semi_resampling) to mitigate the data imbalance effect in a realistic scenario. The code of this analysis is publicly available at https://github.com/b2slab/imbalance_pcm_benchmark.

Indexed as

Deep LearningComputer SimulationLigandsMachine LearningLigands

Identifiers

PMID33779173
PMCPMC8594867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.