Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33778957›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2021

Does Medicaid coverage of Medicare cost sharing affect physician care for dual-eligible Medicare beneficiaries?

Eric T Roberts, Sunita M Desai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric T RobertsDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7439-0799
Sunita M DesaiDepartment of Population Health, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7962-5091

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Caterina Rosano · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Designing policies to incentivize high-quality health care for vulnerable Americans: Evidence from the 340B Drug Pricing ProgramK01HS026980 · AHRQ · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DESAI, SUNITA · 2020 to 2024
$786k
Financial assistance for low-income Medicare beneficiaries: Using natural experiments to assess effects on care and health outcomesK01HS026727 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ROBERTS, ERIC T · 2019 to 2022
$545k
AHRQ HHS K01 HS026727AHRQ HHS K01 HS026980NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess changes in physicians' provision of care to duals (low-income individuals with Medicare and Medicaid) in response to a policy that required Medicaid to fully pay Medicare's cost sharing for office visits with these patients. This policy-a provision of the Affordable Care Act-effectively increased payments for office visits with duals by 0%-20%, depending on the state, in 2013 and 2014. DATA SOURCES: Fee-for-service claims for a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries in 2010-2016. STUDY

designWe conducted a difference-in-differences analysis to compare changes in office visits among Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries (QMBs)-the largest subpopulation of duals for whom payment rates were affected by this policy-to changes among other low-income Medicare beneficiaries for whom payment rates were unaffected (pooled across all states). Next, we conducted a triple-differences analysis that compared changes between QMBs and other low-income beneficiaries in 33 states with payment rate increases of approximately 20% to analogous changes in 14 states without payment increases. DATA COLLECTION: The study included administrative Medicare enrollment and claims data for QMBs and a comparison group of other low-income Medicare beneficiaries (1 914 073 beneficiary-years from 2010 to 2016). PRINCIPAL

findingsNationally, we did not find a differential increase in office visits among QMBs versus other low-income beneficiaries that coincided with this payment change. In the triple-differences analysis, we did not observe a greater increase in visits among QMBs vs other low-income beneficiaries in states where the policy resulted in large (approximately 20%) increases in payment rates vs states where payment rates were unaffected (triple-differences estimate: -0.12 annual visits, 95% CI: -0.28, 0.04; P = 0.15).

conclusionsPhysicians' provision of care to low-income Medicare beneficiaries may not be responsive to short-run payment changes.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCost SharingFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMaleMedicaidMedicarePhysiciansPovertyQuality of Health CareSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesAffordable Care Actdual eligiblesphysician incentives

Identifiers

PMID33778957
PMCPMC8143678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.