Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33778693›Full record

SynthesisRadiology. Imaging cancer2020

Endogenous Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI for the Diagnosis and Therapy Response Assessment of Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review.

Sachi Okuchi, Ahmed Hammam, Xavier Golay, Mina Kim, Stefanie Thust

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Contemporary surgical strategies for resection of intracranial gliomas.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. BTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sachi OkuchiDepartment of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College London, Institute of Neurology, London, England (S.O., A.H., X.G., M.K., S.T.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan (S.O.); and Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, England (S.T.).ORCID 0000-0002-8279-2181
Ahmed HammamDepartment of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College London, Institute of Neurology, London, England (S.O., A.H., X.G., M.K., S.T.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan (S.O.); and Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, England (S.T.).
Xavier GolayDepartment of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College London, Institute of Neurology, London, England (S.O., A.H., X.G., M.K., S.T.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan (S.O.); and Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, England (S.T.).
Mina KimDepartment of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College London, Institute of Neurology, London, England (S.O., A.H., X.G., M.K., S.T.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan (S.O.); and Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, England (S.T.).
Stefanie ThustDepartment of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College London, Institute of Neurology, London, England (S.O., A.H., X.G., M.K., S.T.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan (S.O.); and Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, England (S.T.).ORCID 0000-0001-5136-6000
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To generate a narrative synthesis of published data on the use of endogenous chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI in brain tumors. Materials and Methods: A systematic database search (PubMed, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Library) was used to collate eligible studies. Two researchers independently screened publications according to predefined exclusion and inclusion criteria, followed by comprehensive data extraction. All included studies were subjected to a bias risk assessment using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Results: The electronic database search identified 430 studies, of which 36 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The final selection of included studies was categorized into five groups as follows: grading gliomas, 19 studies (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.500-1.000); predicting molecular subtypes of gliomas, five studies (AUC, 0.610-0.920); distinction of different brain tumor types, seven studies (AUC, 0.707-0.905); therapy response assessment, three studies (AUC not given); and differentiating recurrence from treatment-related changes, five studies (AUC, 0.880-0.980). A high bias risk was observed in a substantial proportion of studies. Conclusion: Endogenous CEST MRI offers valuable, potentially unique information in brain tumors, but its diagnostic accuracy remains incompletely known. Further research is required to assess the method's role in support of molecular genetic diagnosis, to investigate its use in the posttreatment phase, and to compare techniques with a view to standardization.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

PMID33778693
PMCPMC7983695
OpenAlexW3004261319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.