Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33778659›Full record

ReviewRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging2021

An Update on Coronary Artery Calcium Interpretation at Chest and Cardiac CT.

Olufunmilayo H Obisesan, Albert D Osei, S M Iftekhar Uddin, Omar Dzaye, Michael J Blaha

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of coronary artery calcium score by age and sex: a multicenter study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olufunmilayo H ObisesanJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205 (O.H.O., A.D.O., S.M.I.U., O.D., M.J.B.); American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, Tex (O.H.O., A.D.O., S.M.I.U., M.J.B.); and Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (O.D.).ORCID 0000-0001-7247-5257
Albert D OseiJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205 (O.H.O., A.D.O., S.M.I.U., O.D., M.J.B.); American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, Tex (O.H.O., A.D.O., S.M.I.U., M.J.B.); and Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (O.D.).
S M Iftekhar UddinJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205 (O.H.O., A.D.O., S.M.I.U., O.D., M.J.B.); American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, Tex (O.H.O., A.D.O., S.M.I.U., M.J.B.); and Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (O.D.).ORCID 0000-0001-6383-0886
Omar DzayeJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205 (O.H.O., A.D.O., S.M.I.U., O.D., M.J.B.); American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, Tex (O.H.O., A.D.O., S.M.I.U., M.J.B.); and Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (O.D.).ORCID 0000-0001-9483-3510
Michael J BlahaJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205 (O.H.O., A.D.O., S.M.I.U., O.D., M.J.B.); American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, Tex (O.H.O., A.D.O., S.M.I.U., M.J.B.); and Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (O.D.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a marker of overall coronary atherosclerotic burden in an individual. As such, it is an important tool in cardiovascular risk stratification and preventive treatment of asymptomatic patients with unclear cardiovascular disease risk. Several guidelines have recommended the use of CAC testing in shared decision making between the clinician and patient. With recent updates in clinical management guidelines and broad recommendations for CAC, there is a need for concise updated information on CAC interpretation on traditional electrocardiographically gated scans and nongated thoracic scans. Important points to report when interpreting CAC scans include: the absolute Agatston score and the age, sex, and race-specific CAC percentile; general recommendations on time-to-rescan for individuals with a CAC score of 0; the number of vessels with CAC; the presence of CAC in the left main coronary artery; and specific highlighting of individuals with very high CAC scores of greater than 1000. When risk factor information is available, the 10-year coronary heart disease risk can also be easily assessed using the free online Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis risk score calculator. Recent improvements in standardizing the reporting of CAC findings across gated and nongated studies, such as the CAC Data and Reporting System, show promise for improving the widespread clinical value of CAC in clinical practice. © RSNA, 2021.

Identifiers

PMID33778659
PMCPMC7977732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.