ArticleRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging2020
Variability of MRI Aortic Stiffness Measurements in a Multicenter Clinical Trial Setting: Intraobserver, Interobserver, and Intracenter Variability of Pulse Wave Velocity and Aortic Strain Measurement.
Article in Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01870739 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Parallel Group, 52-week Study to Evaluate the Effect of LCZ696 Compared to Olmesartan on Regional Aortic Stiffness in Subjects With Essential Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Parallel Group, 52-week Study to Evaluate the Effect of LCZ696 Compared to Olmesartan on Regional Aortic Stiffness in Subjects With Essential Hypertension
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical measurements of aortic stiffness and peripheral resistance using a routine echocardiogram.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Aging and Risk Assessment: How Multimodality Imaging Can Help.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Value of Serial Measurement of Arterial Stiffness in Cardiovascular Disease.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Aging: A Review by the VascAgeNet COST Action.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Review
- Impaired aortic strain and distensibility by cardiac MRI in children with chronic kidney disease.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Plaque Characteristics and Inflammation Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Assessment of Aortic Stiffness by Transthoracic Echocardiographic in Young COVID-19 Patients.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess intraobserver, interobserver, and scan-rescan variability of MRI aortic stiffness measurements in a multicenter trial setting. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in a multicenter prospective clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT01870739). Forty-five adult patients (31 men; mean age, 58 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 15 patients per center; three centers) with arterial hypertension underwent standardized 3-T baseline MRI assessments between June and September 2014. Aortic strain was calculated from maximum and minimum aortic area measurements repeated three times by three readers at three aortic levels on three retrospectively gated axial gradient-echo (GRE) data sets. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) was assessed three times by five readers as Δx/Δt: Δx was measured on a parasagittal GRE image of the aortic arch, and Δt was extracted from ascending and descending aortic velocity curves created on three axial phase-contrast acquisitions. Intraobserver, interobserver, and scan-rescan variability was calculated using percentage coefficient of variation (COV).
resultsAortic strain variability was lowest at the level of the distal descending aorta (DDA) with median COVs of 1.6% for intraobserver variability, 4.0% for interobserver variability, and 10.3% for scan-rescan variability. It was highest at the ascending aorta (AA) with COVs of 3.6% for intraobserver variability, 10.7% for interobserver variability, and 19.8% for scan-rescan variability. Variability of PWV was low: 0.7% for intraobserver variability, 1.5% for interobserver variability, and 8.1% for scan-rescan variability.
conclusionLow variability can be achieved for aortic strain and PWV measurements in a multicenter trial setting using standardized MRI protocols. Although COV was lower when measuring aortic strain at DDA compared with AA, variability was acceptable at both anatomic locations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.