ArticleRadiology. Cardiothoracic imaging2019
Left Ventricular Mid-Diastolic Wall Thickness: Normal Values for Coronary CT Angiography.
Article in Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of electric field and heat distribution due to trends in metal stent diameter in epicardial pulsed field ablation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Low dose threshold for measuring cardiac functional metrics using four-dimensional CT with deep learning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Realistic Aspects of Cardiac Ultrasound in Rats: Practical Tips for Improved Examination.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Conserved chamber-specific polyploidy maintains heart function in Drosophila.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Dual versus single energy cardiac CT to measure extra cellular volume in cardiac amyloidosis: Correlations with cardiac MRI.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023Article
- Article
- Dead Bodybuilders Speaking from the Heart: An Analysis of Autopsy Reports of Bodybuilders That Died Prematurely.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo generate normal reference values for left ventricular mid-diastolic wall thickness (LV-MDWT) measured by using CT angiography. MATERIALS AND
methodsLV-MDWT was measured in 2383 consecutive patients, without structural heart disease, undergoing prospective electrocardiographically (ECG) triggered mid-diastolic coronary CT angiography. LV-MDWT was manually measured on automatically segmented short-axis images according to the American Heart Association's 17-segment model. Commercially available automatic software was used to calculate the left ventricular (LV) mass.
resultsAmong the 2383 patients, average LV-MDWT was 7.24 mm ± 1.86 (standard deviation [SD]), with the basal anteroseptal segment being the thickest wall (8.71 mm ± 2.19) and the apical inferior segment being the thinnest wall (5.9 mm ± 1.58;
conclusionNormal sex- and age-specific reference ranges for LV-MDWT in prospective ECG-triggered mid-diastolic coronary CT angiography have been provided. These benchmarks may expand the diagnostic and prognostic roles of CT angiography, beyond its role in the identification of coronary artery disease.© RSNA, 2019.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.