Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33778475›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2021

How Well Does the Brief Interview for Mental Status Identify Risk for Cognition Mediated Functional Impairment in a Community Sample?

Timothy S Marks, Gordon M Giles, Muhammad O Al-Heizan, Dorothy F Edwards

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Applying the Brief Interview for Mental Status in a Diverse Home Health Patient Population.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Cognitive Impairments and Health System Outcomes in Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Patients With Stroke and Those With Type II Diabetes Mellitus.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Timothy S MarksUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Kinesiology-Occupational Therapy, Madison, WI.
Gordon M GilesDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Samuel Merritt University, Oakland, CA.
Muhammad O Al-HeizanDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Dorothy F EdwardsUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Kinesiology-Occupational Therapy, Madison, WI.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USKing Saud University · SASamuel Merritt University · US

Funding

Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP50AG033514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SAGER, MARK · 2009 to 2018
$16.2M
NIA NIH HHS P50 AG033514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the adequacy of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) compared with other screening tools in identifying individuals with limitations in functional cognition and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).

designCross-sectional observational study.

settingMidsized midwestern city.

participantsWe assessed a convenience sample of community dwelling individuals (N=197) aged 55 years and older who were living independently.

main outcome measuresParticipant scores on the BIMS, Mini-Cog, Menu Task, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were compared with the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills Checkbook Balancing and Shopping tasks (PCST), which are known to predict impairment in complex IADLs associated with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Multiple logistic regression analyses controlling for participant demographics, as well as sensitivity and specificity, were computed for each screening measure using the PCST as the criterion measure.

resultsThe Mini-Cog, Menu Task, and MoCA identified 25.89%, 32.49%, and 47.21% more individuals, respectively, as impaired than the BIMS. In multiple logistical regression analyses, the BIMS correctly identified 58% of those impaired on the PCST. However, each of the alternate screening measures correctly identified at least 70% of individuals as impaired on the PCST.

conclusionsIn this community sample, the BIMS was insensitive to subtle impairments with the potential to compromise community living, suggesting that the BIMS may be inappropriate for use outside nursing home settings.

Indexed as

Activities of daily livingAUC, area under the curveBIMS, Brief Interview for Mental StatusCI, confidence intervalCMS, Center for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesCognitionDiagnostic Testing and ProceduresIADL, instrumental activities of daily livingMoCA, Montreal Cognitive AssessmentOR, odds ratioPASS, Performance Assessment of Self-Care SkillsPCST, Checkbook Balancing and Shopping tasks

Identifiers

PMID33778475
PMCPMC7984985
OpenAlexW3118327096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.