ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2021
Spontaneous Interpersonal Synchronization of Gait: A Systematic Review.
Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interpersonal gait synchronization reduces gait asymmetry and induces a carry-over effect during overground side-by-side walking.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Relationship between trackmakers of the Laetoli footprints from gait synchronization.Evolutionary human sciences · 2025Article
- Sophisticated use of upper limb haptic interactions during adaptive locomotion.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically review the existing evidence of spontaneous synchronization in human gait. DATA SOURCES: EBSCO, PubMed, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to July 2020 using all possible combinations of (1) "spontaneous interpersonal synchronization" or "spontaneous interpersonal coordination" or "unintentional interpersonal synchronization" or "unintentional interpersonal coordination" and (2) "human movement" or "movement" or "walking" or "ambulation" or "gait." STUDY SELECTION: Studies had to focus on spontaneous synchronization in human gait, be published in a peer-reviewed journal, present original data (no review articles were included), and be written in English. The search yielded 137 results, and the inclusion criteria were met by 16 studies. DATA EXTRACTION: Participant demographics, study purpose, setup, procedure, biomechanical measurement, coordination analytical technique, and findings were extracted. Our synthesis focused on the context in which this phenomenon has been studied, the role of sensory information in the emergence of spontaneous interpersonal synchronization in human gait, and the metrics used to quantify this behavior. DATA SYNTHESIS: The included 16 articles ranged from 2007-2019 and used healthy, primarily young subjects to investigate the role of spontaneous interpersonal synchronization on gait behavior, with the majority using a side-by-side walking/running paradigm. All articles reported data supporting spontaneous interpersonal synchronization, with the strength of the synchronization depending on the sensory information available to the participants.
conclusionsWalking alongside an intact locomotor system may provide an effective and biologically variable attractor signal for rehabilitation of gait behavior. Future research should focus on the utility of spontaneous interpersonal synchronization in clinical populations as a noninvasive method to enhance gait rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.